Add test for verifier

Author: AmrDeveloper

clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExprScalar.cpp

@@ -1898,7 +1898,7 @@ mlir::Value ScalarExprEmitter::VisitUnaryImag(const UnaryOperator *e) {
   Expr *op = e->getSubExpr();
   if (op->getType()->isAnyComplexType()) {
     // If it's an l-value, load through the appropriate subobject l-value.
-    // Note that we have to ask E because Op might be an l-value that
+    // Note that we have to ask `e` because `op` might be an l-value that
     // this won't work for, e.g. an Obj-C property.
     if (e->isGLValue()) {
       mlir::Location loc = cgf.getLoc(e->getExprLoc());

clang/lib/CIR/Dialect/IR/CIRDialect.cpp

@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ OpFoldResult cir::ComplexCreateOp::fold(FoldAdaptor adaptor) {
 
 LogicalResult cir::ComplexImagOp::verify() {
   if (getType() != getOperand().getType().getElementType()) {
-    emitOpError() << "cir.complex.imag result type does not match operand type";
+    emitOpError() << ": result type does not match operand type";
     return failure();
   }
   return success();

clang/test/CIR/IR/invalid-complex.cir

@@ -21,3 +21,15 @@ module {
 cir.global external @ci2 = #cir.const_complex<#cir.int<1> : !s32i, #cir.int<2> : !s64i> : !cir.complex<!s32i>
 
 }
+
+// -----
+
+module {
+  cir.func @complex_imag_invalid_result_type() -> !cir.double {
+    %0 = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!cir.double>, !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>, ["c"]
+    %2 = cir.load align(8) %0 : !cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.double>>, !cir.complex<!cir.double>
+    // expected-error @below {{result type does not match operand type}}
+    %3 = cir.complex.imag %2 : !cir.complex<!cir.double> -> !cir.float
+    cir.return
+  }
+}