[Clang] CWG2749: relational operators involving pointers to void

https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2749.html

This DR's effects are backported to C++98.

Does not affect C where integral constant expressions cannot involve pointers.

Author: MitalAshok

clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ Resolutions to C++ Defect Reports
 - P0522 implementation is enabled by default in all language versions, and
   provisional wording for CWG2398 is implemented.
 
+- Clang now allows comparing unequal object pointers that have been cast to ``void *``
+  in constant expressions. These comparisons always worked in non-constant expressions.
+  (`CWG2749: Treatment of "pointer to void" for relational comparisons <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2749.html>`_).
+
 C Language Changes
 ------------------
 

clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticASTKinds.td

@@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ def note_constexpr_var_init_weak : Note<
 def note_constexpr_typeid_polymorphic : Note<
   "typeid applied to expression of polymorphic type %0 is "
   "not allowed in a constant expression in C++ standards before C++20">;
-def note_constexpr_void_comparison : Note<
-  "comparison between unequal pointers to void has unspecified result">;
 def note_constexpr_temporary_here : Note<"temporary created here">;
 def note_constexpr_dynamic_alloc_here : Note<"heap allocation performed here">;
 def note_constexpr_conditional_never_const : Note<

clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp

@@ -13627,16 +13627,6 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const BinaryOperator *E,
     SubobjectDesignator &LHSDesignator = LHSValue.getLValueDesignator();
     SubobjectDesignator &RHSDesignator = RHSValue.getLValueDesignator();
 
-    // C++11 [expr.rel]p3:
-    //   Pointers to void (after pointer conversions) can be compared, with a
-    //   result defined as follows: If both pointers represent the same
-    //   address or are both the null pointer value, the result is true if the
-    //   operator is <= or >= and false otherwise; otherwise the result is
-    //   unspecified.
-    // We interpret this as applying to pointers to *cv* void.
-    if (LHSTy->isVoidPointerType() && LHSOffset != RHSOffset && IsRelational)
-      Info.CCEDiag(E, diag::note_constexpr_void_comparison);
-
     // C++11 [expr.rel]p2:
     // - If two pointers point to non-static data members of the same object,
     //   or to subobjects or array elements fo such members, recursively, the

clang/test/AST/Interp/literals.cpp

@@ -191,12 +191,8 @@ namespace PointerComparison {
   constexpr bool v3 = null == pv; // ok
   constexpr bool v4 = qv == pv; // ok
 
-  /// FIXME: These two are rejected by the current interpreter, but
-  ///   accepted by GCC.
-  constexpr bool v5 = qv >= pv; // ref-error {{constant expression}} \
-                                // ref-note {{unequal pointers to void}}
-  constexpr bool v8 = qv > (void*)&s.a; // ref-error {{constant expression}} \
-                                        // ref-note {{unequal pointers to void}}
+  constexpr bool v5 = qv >= pv;
+  constexpr bool v8 = qv > (void*)&s.a;
   constexpr bool v6 = qv > null; // both-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
                                  // both-note {{comparison between '&s.b' and 'nullptr' has unspecified value}}
 

clang/test/CXX/drs/cwg27xx.cpp

@@ -1,11 +1,23 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++98 -verify=expected %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++98 -Wgnu-folding-constant -verify=expected %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++11 -verify=expected %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++14 -verify=expected %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++17 -verify=expected %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++20 -verify=expected %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++23 -verify=expected,since-cxx23 %s
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-linux-gnu -std=c++2c -verify=expected,since-cxx23,since-cxx26 %s
 
+namespace std {
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+  struct strong_ordering {
+    int n;
+    constexpr operator int() const { return n; }
+    static const strong_ordering less, equal, greater;
+  };
+  constexpr strong_ordering strong_ordering::less{-1},
+      strong_ordering::equal{0}, strong_ordering::greater{1};
+#endif
+}
+
 namespace cwg2718 { // cwg2718: 2.7
 struct B {};
 struct D;
@@ -18,6 +30,38 @@ void f(B b) {
 struct D : B {};
 } // namespace cwg2718
 
+namespace cwg2749 { // cwg2749: 19
+
+extern int x[2];
+struct Y {
+  int i;
+  int j;
+};
+extern Y y[2];
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 201103L
+static_assert(static_cast<void*>(x + 0) < static_cast<void*>(x + 1), "");
+static_assert(static_cast<void*>(&y[0].i) < static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j), "");
+static_assert(static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j) < static_cast<void*>(&y[1].i), "");
+#else
+enum X {
+  a = static_cast<void*>(x + 0) < static_cast<void*>(x + 1),
+// expected-warning@-1 {{expression is not an integral constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+  b = static_cast<void*>(&y[0].i) < static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j),
+// expected-warning@-1 {{expression is not an integral constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+  c = static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j) < static_cast<void*>(&y[1].i)
+// expected-warning@-1 {{expression is not an integral constant expression; folding it to a constant is a GNU extension}}
+};
+#endif
+
+#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
+static_assert((static_cast<void*>(x + 0) <=> static_cast<void*>(x + 1)) == std::strong_ordering::less);
+static_assert((static_cast<void*>(&y[0].i) <=> static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j)) == std::strong_ordering::less);
+static_assert((static_cast<void*>(&y[0].j) <=> static_cast<void*>(&y[1].i)) == std::strong_ordering::less);
+#endif
+
+} // namespace cwg2749
+
 namespace cwg2759 { // cwg2759: 19
 #if __cplusplus >= 201103L
 

clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.const/p2-0x.cpp

@@ -571,18 +571,19 @@ namespace UnspecifiedRelations {
   // [expr.rel]p3: Pointers to void can be compared [...] if both pointers
   // represent the same address or are both the null pointer [...]; otherwise
   // the result is unspecified.
+  // Same address restriction removed by CWG2749
   struct S { int a, b; } s;
   constexpr void *null = 0;
   constexpr void *pv = (void*)&s.a;
   constexpr void *qv = (void*)&s.b;
   constexpr bool v1 = null < (int*)0;
   constexpr bool v2 = null < pv; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{comparison between 'nullptr' and '&s.a' has unspecified value}}
-  constexpr bool v3 = null == pv; // ok
-  constexpr bool v4 = qv == pv; // ok
-  constexpr bool v5 = qv >= pv; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{unequal pointers to void}}
+  constexpr bool v3 = null == pv;
+  constexpr bool v4 = qv == pv;
+  constexpr bool v5 = qv >= pv;
   constexpr bool v6 = qv > null; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{comparison between '&s.b' and 'nullptr' has unspecified value}}
-  constexpr bool v7 = qv <= (void*)&s.b; // ok
-  constexpr bool v8 = qv > (void*)&s.a; // expected-error {{constant expression}} expected-note {{unequal pointers to void}}
+  constexpr bool v7 = qv <= (void*)&s.b;
+  constexpr bool v8 = qv > (void*)&s.a;
 }
 
 // - an assignment or a compound assignment (5.17); or

clang/www/cxx_dr_status.html

@@ -16302,7 +16302,7 @@ <h2 id="cxxdr">C++ defect report implementation status</h2>
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2749.html">2749</a></td>
     <td>DRWP</td>
     <td>Treatment of "pointer to void" for relational comparisons</td>
-    <td class="unknown" align="center">Unknown</td>
+    <td class="unreleased" align="center">Clang 19</td>
   </tr>
   <tr id="2750">
     <td><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2750.html">2750</a></td>