[MLIR][Affine] Fix loop permute validity check for iter_args loops

We cannot guarantee the validity of the interchange if the loops have
iter_args, since the dependence analysis does not take them into account.
Conservatively return false in such cases.

Add an option to check permutation validity in test-loop-permutation pass to
test this change.

Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Tagore <[email protected]>

Author: meshtag

mlir/lib/Dialect/Affine/Utils/LoopUtils.cpp

@@ -1339,6 +1339,15 @@ bool mlir::affine::isValidLoopInterchangePermutation(
   unsigned maxLoopDepth = loops.size();
   if (maxLoopDepth == 1)
     return true;
+
+  // We cannot guarantee the validity of the interchange if the loops have
+  // iter_args, since the dependence analysis does not take them into account.
+  // Conservatively return false in such cases.
+  if (llvm::any_of(loops, [](AffineForOp loop) {
+        return loop.getNumIterOperands() > 0;
+      }))
+    return false;
+
   // Gather dependence components for dependences between all ops in loop nest
   // rooted at 'loops[0]', at loop depths in range [1, maxLoopDepth].
   std::vector<SmallVector<DependenceComponent, 2>> depCompsVec;

mlir/test/Dialect/Affine/loop-permute.mlir

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 // RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -test-loop-permutation="permutation-map=0,2,1" | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-021
 // RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -test-loop-permutation="permutation-map=2,0,1" | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-201
 // RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -test-loop-permutation="permutation-map=2,1,0" | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-210
+// RUN: mlir-opt -allow-unregistered-dialect %s -test-loop-permutation="permutation-map=2,1,0 check-validity=1" | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-210-VALID
 
 // CHECK-120-LABEL: func @permute
 func.func @permute(%U0 : index, %U1 : index, %U2 : index) {
@@ -45,3 +46,34 @@ func.func @permute(%U0 : index, %U1 : index, %U2 : index) {
 
 // CHECK-201:      "foo"(%arg5, %arg3)
 // CHECK-201-NEXT: "bar"(%arg4)
+
+// -----
+
+// Tests that the permutation validation check utility conservatively returns false when the
+// for loop has an iter_arg.
+
+// CHECK-210-VALID-LABEL: func @check_validity_with_iter_args
+// CHECK-210-VALID-SAME:    %[[ARG0:.*]]: index, %[[ARG1:.*]]: index, %[[ARG2:.*]]: index
+func.func @check_validity_with_iter_args(%U0 : index, %U1 : index, %U2 : index) {
+  %buf = memref.alloc() : memref<100x100xf32>
+  %cst = arith.constant 1.0 : f32
+  %c10 = arith.constant 10 : index
+  %c20 = arith.constant 20 : index
+
+  // Check that the loops are not permuted.
+  // CHECK-210-VALID:       affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to %[[ARG0]] {
+  // CHECK-210-VALID-NEXT:    affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to %[[ARG1]] {
+  // CHECK-210-VALID-NEXT:      affine.for %{{.*}} = 0 to %[[ARG2]] iter_args(
+  affine.for %arg0 = 0 to %U0 {
+    affine.for %arg1 = 0 to %U1 {
+      %res = affine.for %arg2 = 0 to %U2 iter_args(%iter1 = %cst) -> (f32) {
+        %val = affine.load %buf[%arg0 + 10, %arg1 + 20] : memref<100x100xf32>
+        %newVal = arith.addf %val, %cst : f32
+        affine.store %newVal, %buf[%arg0 + 10, %arg1 + 20] : memref<100x100xf32>
+        %newVal2 = arith.addf %newVal, %iter1 : f32
+        affine.yield %iter1 : f32
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  return
+}

mlir/test/lib/Dialect/Affine/TestLoopPermutation.cpp

@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@ struct TestLoopPermutation
   ListOption<unsigned> permList{*this, "permutation-map",
                                 llvm::cl::desc("Specify the loop permutation"),
                                 llvm::cl::OneOrMore};
+
+  /// Specify whether to check validity of loop permutation.
+  Option<bool> checkValidity{
+      *this, "check-validity",
+      llvm::cl::desc("Check validity of the loop permutation"),
+      llvm::cl::init(false)};
 };
 
 } // namespace
@@ -60,6 +66,9 @@ void TestLoopPermutation::runOnOperation() {
     // Permute if the nest's size is consistent with the specified
     // permutation.
     if (nest.size() >= 2 && nest.size() == permMap.size()) {
+      if (checkValidity.getValue() &&
+          !isValidLoopInterchangePermutation(nest, permMap))
+        continue;
       permuteLoops(nest, permMap);
     }
   }