Skip to content

Conversation

@cjacek
Copy link
Contributor

@cjacek cjacek commented Nov 14, 2024

No description provided.

@cjacek cjacek requested a review from mstorsjo November 14, 2024 21:29
@llvmbot llvmbot added the lld label Nov 14, 2024
@cjacek
Copy link
Contributor Author

cjacek commented Nov 14, 2024

The main missing piece now is support for -machine:arm64x. I have a draft for it and hope to submit it soon.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Nov 14, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

Author: Jacek Caban (cjacek)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116282.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+2)
diff --git a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 5dfb31a360e4e8..e8b27aaf840585 100644
--- a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -43,6 +43,8 @@ COFF Improvements
 -----------------
 * ``/includeglob`` has been implemented to match the behavior of ``--undefined-glob`` available for ELF.
 * ``/lldsavetemps`` allows saving select intermediate LTO compilation results (e.g. resolution, preopt, promote, internalize, import, opt, precodegen, prelink, combinedindex).
+* ``/machine:arm64ec`` support completed, enabling the linking of ARM64EC images.
+* COFF weak anti-dependency alias symbols are now supported.
 
 MinGW Improvements
 ------------------

@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member

Nitpick: Typo in the PR subject, s/node/note/. I'll try to get to reviewing the patches you posted tomorrow.

@cjacek cjacek changed the title [LLD] Add ARM64EC release node [LLD] Add ARM64EC release note Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mstorsjo mstorsjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cjacek cjacek merged commit e6cc589 into llvm:main Nov 15, 2024
11 checks passed
@cjacek cjacek deleted the arm64ec-relnote branch November 15, 2024 15:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants