Thread safety analysis: Don't warn on acquiring reentrant capability #150857
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-negative. However, we still propagate explicit negative requirements.
llvmbot
added
clang
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis Author: Aaron Puchert (aaronpuchert) ChangesThe point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-negative. However, we still propagate explicit negative requirements. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150857.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
index 80e7c8eff671a..dadb0b757a2c8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Analysis/ThreadSafety.cpp
@@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ void ThreadSafetyAnalyzer::addLock(FactSet &FSet,
FSet.removeLock(FactMan, NegC);
}
else {
- if (inCurrentScope(*Entry) && !Entry->asserted())
+ if (inCurrentScope(*Entry) && !Entry->asserted() && !Entry->reentrant())
Handler.handleNegativeNotHeld(Entry->getKind(), Entry->toString(),
NegC.toString(), Entry->loc());
}
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-negative.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-negative.cpp
index 9eabd67e4fc76..0caf6d6139e58 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-negative.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/warn-thread-safety-negative.cpp
@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ class LOCKABLE Mutex {
void AssertReaderHeld() ASSERT_SHARED_LOCK();
};
+class LOCKABLE REENTRANT_CAPABILITY ReentrantMutex {
+public:
+ void Lock() EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION();
+ void Unlock() UNLOCK_FUNCTION();
+
+ // for negative capabilities
+ const ReentrantMutex& operator!() const { return *this; }
+};
+
class SCOPED_LOCKABLE MutexLock {
public:
MutexLock(Mutex *mu) EXCLUSIVE_LOCK_FUNCTION(mu);
@@ -89,6 +98,29 @@ class Foo {
}
};
+class Reentrant {
+ ReentrantMutex mu;
+
+public:
+ void acquire() {
+ mu.Lock(); // no warning -- reentrant mutex
+ mu.Unlock();
+ }
+
+ void requireNegative() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!mu) { // warning?
+ mu.Lock();
+ mu.Unlock();
+ }
+
+ void callRequireNegative() {
+ requireNegative(); // expected-warning{{calling function 'requireNegative' requires negative capability '!mu'}}
+ }
+
+ void callHaveNegative() EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(!mu) {
+ requireNegative();
+ }
+};
+
} // end namespace SimpleTest
Mutex globalMutex;
|
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/123/builds/24610 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/186/builds/11280 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference |
|
/cherry-pick a048aeb |
|
/pull-request #151889 |
tru
pushed a commit
to llvmbot/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2025
…lvm#150857) The point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-negative. However, we still propagate explicit negative requirements. (cherry picked from commit a048aeb)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The point of reentrant capabilities is that they can be acquired multiple times, so they should probably be excluded from requiring a negative capability on acquisition via -Wthread-safety-negative.
However, we still propagate explicit negative requirements.