[flang] Allow for equivalent types in non-TBP defined I/O #158755
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Non-extensible derived type -- those with SEQUENCE or BIND(C) -- are allowed as monomorphic "dtv" dummy arguments to defined I/O subroutines. Fortran's type rules admit structural equivalence for these types, and it's possible that I/O might be attempted in a scope using a non-extensible type that's equivalent to a non-type-bound generic interface's specific procedure's "dtv" dummy argument's type, but not defined in the same place.
Fixes #158673.
This is an IBM Fortran test case that doesn't need to be duplicated in LLVM.