-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[LoopUnroll] Fix block frequencies for epilogue #159163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[LoopUnroll] Fix block frequencies for epilogue #159163
Conversation
For example: ``` declare void @f(i32) define void @test(i32 %n) { entry: br label %do.body do.body: %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %do.body ] %inc = add i32 %i, 1 call void @f(i32 %i) %c = icmp sge i32 %inc, %n br i1 %c, label %do.end, label %do.body, !prof !0 do.end: ret void } !0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 9} ``` Given those branch weights, once any loop iteration is actually reached, the probability of the loop exiting at the iteration's end is 1/(1+9). That is, the loop is likely to exit every 10 iterations and thus has an estimated trip count of 10. `opt -passes='print<block-freq>'` shows that 10 is indeed the frequency of the loop body: ``` Printing analysis results of BFI for function 'test': block-frequency-info: test - entry: float = 1.0, int = 1801439852625920 - do.body: float = 10.0, int = 18014398509481984 - do.end: float = 1.0, int = 1801439852625920 ``` Key Observation: The frequency of reaching any particular iteration is less than for the previous iteration because the previous iteration has a non-zero probability of exiting the loop. This observation holds even though every loop iteration, once actually reached, has exactly the same probability of exiting and thus exactly the same branch weights. Now we use `opt -unroll-force-peel-count=2 -passes=loop-unroll` to peel 2 iterations and insert them before the remaining loop. We expect the key observation above not to change, but it does under the implementation without this patch. The block frequency becomes 1.0 for the first iteration, 0.9 for the second, and 6.4 for the main loop body. Again, a decreasing frequency is expected, but it decreases too much: the total frequency of the original loop body becomes 8.3. The new branch weights reveal the problem: ``` !0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 9} !1 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 8} !2 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 7} ``` The exit probability is now 1/10 for the first peeled iteration, 1/9 for the second, and 1/8 for the remaining loop iterations. It seems this behavior is trying to ensure a decreasing block frequency. However, as in the key observation above for the original loop, that happens correctly without decreasing the branch weights across iterations. This patch changes the peeling implementation not to decrease the branch weights across loop iterations so that the frequency for every iteration is the same as it was in the original loop. The total frequency of the loop body, summed across all its occurrences, thus remains 10 after peeling. Unfortunately, that change means a later analysis cannot accurately estimate the trip count of the remaining loop while examining the remaining loop in isolation without considering the probability of actually reaching it. For that purpose, this patch stores the new trip count as separate metadata named `llvm.loop.estimated_trip_count` and extends `llvm::getLoopEstimatedTripCount` to prefer it, if present, over branch weights. An alternative fix is for `llvm::getLoopEstimatedTripCount` to subtract the `llvm.loop.peeled.count` metadata from the trip count estimated by a loop's branch weights. However, there might be other loop transformations that still corrupt block frequencies in a similar manner and require a similar fix. `llvm.loop.estimated_trip_count` is intended to provide a general way to store estimated trip counts when branch weights cannot directly store them. This patch introduces several fixme comments that need to be addressed before it can land.
Extending beyond the limitations of `getExpectedExitLoopLatchBranch` is a possible improvement for the future not an urgent fixme. No one has pointed out code that computes estimated trip counts without using `llvm::getLoopEstimatedTripCount`.
The update adds this PR's new metadata.
This patch implements the `llvm.loop.estimated_trip_count` metadata discussed in [[RFC] Fix Loop Transformations to Preserve Block Frequencies](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fix-loop-transformations-to-preserve-block-frequencies/85785). As [suggested in the RFC comments](https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-fix-loop-transformations-to-preserve-block-frequencies/85785/4), it adds the new metadata to all loops at the time of profile ingestion and estimates each trip count from the loop's `branch_weights` metadata. As [suggested in the PR#128785 review](#128785 (comment)), it does so via a `PGOEstimateTripCountsPass` pass, which creates the new metadata for the loop but omits the value if it cannot estimate a trip count due to the loop's form. An important observation not previously discussed is that `PGOEstimateTripCountsPass` *often* cannot estimate a loop's trip count but later passes can transform the loop in a way that makes it possible. Currently, such passes do not necessarily update the metadata, but eventually that should be fixed. Until then, if the new metadata has no value, `llvm::getLoopEstimatedTripCount` disregards it and tries again to estimate the trip count from the loop's `branch_weights` metadata.
Somehow, on some of my builds, `llvm::` prefixes are dropped from some symbol names in the printed past list.
That's PR #128785, which is now a parent PR. First, remove a todo that's now documented more generally than LoopPeel in plenty of other places. Second, update LoopPeel's setLoopEstimatedTripCount call to avoid a now redundant argument that eventually won't be supported.
| if (OriginalTripCount) { | ||
| unsigned NewTripCount = *OriginalTripCount / ULO.Count; | ||
| if (!ULO.Runtime && *OriginalTripCount % ULO.Count) | ||
| NewTripCount += 1; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: ++NewTripCount?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Done. I was thinking in Python, I guess.
| if (!ForFirstTarget) | ||
| std::swap(Prob0, Prob1); | ||
| MDBuilder MDB(B->getContext()); | ||
| B->setMetadata( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you can use setBranchWeights from ProfDataUtils.h, less boylerplate
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks. Done. I also applied that in setLoopEstimatedTripCount for consistency.
|
ping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this is causing a crash for the opt -passes='loop-unroll<O3>':
target datalayout = "e-m:o-p270:32:32-p271:32:32-p272:64:64-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128-Fn32"
target triple = "arm64-apple-macosx12.0.0"
define void @test() #0 {
entry:
br label %loop
for.cond.cleanup:
ret void
loop:
br i1 false, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %loop, !prof !0
}
attributes #0 = { "target-cpu"="neoverse-512tvb" }
!0 = !{!"branch_weights", i32 0, i32 0}
Thanks. Is there a bot somewhere that shows the crash? |
no, this is when building a large C/C++ workload |
BranchProbability fails an assert when its denominator is zero. Reported at <#159163 (review)>.
PR #165938 fixes it for me. |
Could you take a look at this? I used bisect to determine the crash was caused by this PR, but your fix doesn't seem to fully fix the problem I'm encountering. To be precise, the original crash was fixed, but it subsequently crashed in the same manner elsewhere. Furthermore, it appears the problem doesn't occur as long as --pgso=false is not specified. |
|
Now there's a simpler reproducer. |
As another step in issue llvm#135812, this patch fixes block frequencies for partial loop unrolling with an epilogue remainder loop. It does not fully handle the case when the epilogue loop itself is unrolled. That will be handled in the next patch. For the guard and latch of each of the unrolled loop and epilogue loop, this patch sets branch weights derived directly from the original loop latch branch weights. The total frequency of the original loop body, summed across all its occurrences in the unrolled loop and epilogue loop, is the same as in the original loop. This patch also sets `llvm.loop.estimated_trip_count` for the epilogue loop instead of relying on the epilogue's latch branch weights to imply it. This patch fixes branch weights in tests that PR llvm#157754 adversely affected.
BranchProbability fails an assert when its denominator is zero. Reported at <#159163 (review)>.
…5938) BranchProbability fails an assert when its denominator is zero. Reported at <llvm/llvm-project#159163 (review)>.
|
@Andarwinux Thanks for letting me know.
As I commented there, I need instructions to reproduce that bug.
That one seems to be resolved by PR #165938. |
As another step in issue #135812, this patch fixes block frequencies for partial loop unrolling with an epilogue remainder loop. It does not fully handle the case when the epilogue loop itself is unrolled. That will be handled in the next patch.
For the guard and latch of each of the unrolled loop and epilogue loop, this patch sets branch weights derived directly from the original loop latch branch weights. The total frequency of the original loop body, summed across all its occurrences in the unrolled loop and epilogue loop, is the same as in the original loop. This patch also sets
llvm.loop.estimated_trip_countfor the epilogue loop instead of relying on the epilogue's latch branch weights to imply it.This patch fixes branch weights in tests that PR #157754 adversely affected.