-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[ShrinkWrap][NFC] Test with load from constant pool preventing shrink #162476
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[ShrinkWrap][NFC] Test with load from constant pool preventing shrink #162476
Conversation
wrapping Shrink wrapping treats a load from constant pool as a stack access. This is not correct. Constants are basically stored in read only section AFAIU. This prevents shrink wrapping from kicking in. (Related to PR llvm#160257. PR llvm#160257 will be closed.)
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64 Author: Sushant Gokhale (sushgokh) Changeswrapping Shrink wrapping treats a load from constant pool as a stack access. This is not correct. Constants are basically stored in read only section AFAIU. This prevents shrink wrapping from kicking in. (Related to PR #160257. PR #160257 will be closed.) Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162476.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/shrink-wrap-const-pool-access.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/shrink-wrap-const-pool-access.mir
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..ff652a58cae88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AArch64/shrink-wrap-const-pool-access.mir
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+--- |
+ ; RUN: llc -x=mir -simplify-mir -run-pass=shrink-wrap -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+ ; CHECK-NOT: savePoint
+ ; CHECK-NOT: restorePoint
+
+ declare double @foo()
+
+ define double @shrink_wrap_load_from_const_pool(double %q) {
+ entry:
+ %0 = fcmp oeq double %q, 3.125500e+02
+ br i1 %0, label %common.ret, label %if.else
+
+ common.ret: ; preds = %if.else, %entry, %exit1
+ %common.ret.op = phi double [ %3, %exit1 ], [ 0.000000e+00, %entry ], [ 0.000000e+00, %if.else ]
+ ret double %common.ret.op
+
+ if.else: ; preds = %entry
+ %1 = call double @foo()
+ %2 = fcmp oeq double %1, 0.000000e+00
+ br i1 %2, label %exit1, label %common.ret
+
+ exit1: ; preds = %if.else
+ %3 = call double @foo()
+ br label %common.ret
+ }
+...
+---
+name: shrink_wrap_load_from_const_pool
+tracksRegLiveness: true
+constants:
+ - id: 0
+ value: 'double 3.125500e+02'
+ alignment: 8
+body: |
+ bb.0.entry:
+ successors: %bb.4(0x50000000), %bb.2(0x30000000)
+ liveins: $d0
+
+ renamable $d1 = COPY $d0
+ renamable $x8 = ADRP target-flags(aarch64-page) %const.0
+ renamable $d2 = LDRDui killed renamable $x8, target-flags(aarch64-pageoff, aarch64-nc) %const.0 :: (load (s64) from constant-pool)
+ renamable $d0 = FMOVD0
+ nofpexcept FCMPDrr killed renamable $d1, killed renamable $d2, implicit-def $nzcv, implicit $fpcr
+ Bcc 1, %bb.2, implicit killed $nzcv
+
+ bb.4:
+ liveins: $d0
+
+ bb.1.common.ret:
+ liveins: $d0
+
+ RET_ReallyLR implicit $d0
+
+ bb.2.if.else:
+ successors: %bb.3(0x50000000), %bb.1(0x30000000)
+
+ ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
+ BL @foo, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $d0
+ ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
+ renamable $d1 = COPY $d0
+ renamable $d0 = FMOVD0
+ nofpexcept FCMPDri killed renamable $d1, implicit-def $nzcv, implicit $fpcr
+ Bcc 1, %bb.1, implicit killed $nzcv
+ B %bb.3
+
+ bb.3.exit1:
+ ADJCALLSTACKDOWN 0, 0, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
+ BL @foo, csr_aarch64_aapcs, implicit-def dead $lr, implicit $sp, implicit-def $sp, implicit-def $d0
+ ADJCALLSTACKUP 0, 0, implicit-def dead $sp, implicit $sp
+ B %bb.1
+...
|
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ | |||
--- | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you need the LLVM section?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel it can just be removed
--- | | ||
; RUN: llc -x=mir -simplify-mir -run-pass=shrink-wrap -o - %s | FileCheck %s | ||
; CHECK-NOT: savePoint | ||
; CHECK-NOT: restorePoint |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add a comment on what this is testing and what we are checking here?
value: 'double 3.125500e+02' | ||
alignment: 8 | ||
body: | | ||
bb.0.entry: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Get rid of the .llvmir_names
in the basic block names so that you don't need the LLVM IR section.
wrapping
Shrink wrapping treats a load from constant pool as a stack access. This is not correct. Constants are basically stored in read only section AFAIU. This prevents shrink wrapping from kicking in.
(Related to PR #160257. PR #160257 will be closed.)