-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
[FastISel] Don't select a CallInst as a BasicBlock in the SelectionDAG fallback if it has bundled ops #162895
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…G fallback if it has bundled ops
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86 @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-selectiondag Author: Daniel Paoliello (dpaoliello) ChangesThis was discovered while looking at the codegen for x64 when Control Flow Guard is enabled. When using However, when Fast ISel was used the following is generated: This was happening despite Fast ISel aborting and falling back to The root cause for this code gen is that The fix for this is to not use the special case when a Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162895.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
index 175753f08d2b1..58539bd4cea3a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
@@ -1825,6 +1825,14 @@ void SelectionDAGISel::SelectAllBasicBlocks(const Function &Fn) {
reportFastISelFailure(*MF, *ORE, R, EnableFastISelAbort > 2);
+ // If the call has operand bundles, then it's best if they are handled
+ // together with the call instead of selecting the call as its own
+ // block.
+ if (cast<CallInst>(Inst)->hasOperandBundles()) {
+ NumFastIselFailures += NumFastIselRemaining;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (!Inst->getType()->isVoidTy() && !Inst->getType()->isTokenTy() &&
!Inst->use_empty()) {
Register &R = FuncInfo->ValueMap[Inst];
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cfguard-checks.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cfguard-checks.ll
index a727bbbfdcbe3..3a2de718e8a1b 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cfguard-checks.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/cfguard-checks.ll
@@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-pc-windows-msvc | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=X86
-; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MSVC
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MSVC,X64_SELDAG
+; RUN: llc < %s --fast-isel -mtriple=x86_64-pc-windows-msvc | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MSVC,X64_FISEL
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=i686-w64-windows-gnu | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X86,X86_MINGW
-; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MINGW
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MINGW,X64_SELDAG
+; RUN: llc < %s --fast-isel -mtriple=x86_64-w64-windows-gnu | FileCheck %s -check-prefixes=X64,X64_MINGW,X64_FISEL
; Control Flow Guard is currently only available on Windows
; Test that Control Flow Guard checks are correctly added when required.
@@ -27,7 +29,8 @@ entry:
; X64-LABEL: func_guard_nocf
; X64: leaq target_func(%rip), %rax
; X64-NOT: __guard_dispatch_icall_fptr
- ; X64: callq *%rax
+ ; X64_SELDAG: callq *%rax
+ ; X64_FISEL: callq *32(%rsp)
}
attributes #0 = { "guard_nocf" }
|
|
|
||
| reportFastISelFailure(*MF, *ORE, R, EnableFastISelAbort > 2); | ||
|
|
||
| // If the call has operand bundles, then it's best if they are handled |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand the flow here. These seems pretty far removed from where the problem is?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The root cause of the problem is that SelectionDAG is designed to lower CallInst and its bundled ops together: for example, both the indirect call and the address-of GlobalValue that are generated in CF Guard (which can then be lowered as a call to the address of a GlobalValue, instead of reading the value and then calling to a register).
I'm not sure why SelectionDAGISel has this special case here (I assume to try to lower calls via SelectionDAG but then allow the rest of the block to be handled by FastISel), but it breaks that assumption and causes suboptimal codegen.
This was discovered while looking at the codegen for x64 when Control Flow Guard is enabled.
When using
SelectionDAG, LLVM would generate the following sequence for a CF guarded indirect call:However, when Fast ISel was used the following is generated:
This was happening despite Fast ISel aborting and falling back to
SelectionDAG.The root cause for this code gen is that
SelectionDAGISelhas a special case when Fast ISel aborts when lowering aCallInstwhere it tries to lower the instruction as its own basic block, which for such a CF Guard call means that it is lowering an indirect call to__guard_dispatch_icall_fptrwithout observing that the function was being loaded into a pointer in the preceding (and bundled) instruction.The fix for this is to not use the special case when a
CallInsthas bundled instructions: it's better to allow the call and its bundled instructions to be lowered together bySelectionDAGinstead.