Skip to content

Conversation

@artagnon
Copy link
Contributor

foldSelectEquivalence has an artificial limitation around checking that the compare-instruction is not a vector type. Trivially lifting this limitation does not lead to any bad test changes.

-- 8< --
Based on #111694.

What am I missing?

Write dedicated tests for foldSelectValueEquivalence, demonstrating that
it does not perform many GVN-like replacements on vector-values, as a
prelude to fixing this deficiency.
foldSelectEquivalence has an artificial limitation around checking that
the compare-instruction is not a vector type. Trivially lifting this
limitation does not lead to any bad test changes.
@artagnon artagnon closed this Oct 11, 2024
@artagnon artagnon deleted the ic-select-equiv branch October 11, 2024 09:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant