-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[HLSL] Add Append/ConsumeStructuredBuffer definitions to HLSLExternalSemaSource #113643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ExternalSemaSource Add separate tests for the AST shape and element types. Add constructor/handle.fromBinding test case to shared test file. These buffers do not have any subscript operators. Append and Consume methods will be added later in llvm#112968. Fixes llvm#112777
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang @llvm/pr-subscribers-hlsl Author: Helena Kotas (hekota) ChangesAdds These buffers do not have any subscript operators. Append and Consume methods will be added later in llvm/llvm-project#112968. Fixes #112777 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113643.diff 6 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExternalSemaSource.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExternalSemaSource.cpp
index ce8564429b3802..22ca9f72d40a30 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExternalSemaSource.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/HLSLExternalSemaSource.cpp
@@ -530,6 +530,28 @@ void HLSLExternalSemaSource::defineHLSLTypesWithForwardDeclarations() {
.addArraySubscriptOperators()
.completeDefinition();
});
+
+ Decl =
+ BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder(*SemaPtr, HLSLNamespace, "AppendStructuredBuffer")
+ .addSimpleTemplateParams(*SemaPtr, {"element_type"})
+ .Record;
+ onCompletion(Decl, [this](CXXRecordDecl *Decl) {
+ setupBufferType(Decl, *SemaPtr, ResourceClass::UAV,
+ ResourceKind::TypedBuffer, /*IsROV=*/false,
+ /*RawBuffer=*/true)
+ .completeDefinition();
+ });
+
+ Decl =
+ BuiltinTypeDeclBuilder(*SemaPtr, HLSLNamespace, "ConsumeStructuredBuffer")
+ .addSimpleTemplateParams(*SemaPtr, {"element_type"})
+ .Record;
+ onCompletion(Decl, [this](CXXRecordDecl *Decl) {
+ setupBufferType(Decl, *SemaPtr, ResourceClass::UAV,
+ ResourceKind::TypedBuffer, /*IsROV=*/false,
+ /*RawBuffer=*/true)
+ .completeDefinition();
+ });
}
void HLSLExternalSemaSource::onCompletion(CXXRecordDecl *Record,
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/HLSL/AppendStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl b/clang/test/AST/HLSL/AppendStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..2ede9dfacae7c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/AST/HLSL/AppendStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-library -x hlsl -ast-dump -DEMPTY %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=EMPTY %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-library -x hlsl -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s
+
+
+// This test tests two different AST generations. The "EMPTY" test mode verifies
+// the AST generated by forward declaration of the HLSL types which happens on
+// initializing the HLSL external AST with an AST Context.
+
+// The non-empty mode has a use that requires the AppendStructuredBuffer type be complete,
+// which results in the AST being populated by the external AST source. That
+// case covers the full implementation of the template declaration and the
+// instantiated specialization.
+
+// EMPTY: ClassTemplateDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit AppendStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NEXT: TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class depth 0 index 0 element_type
+// EMPTY-NEXT: CXXRecordDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit <undeserialized declarations> class AppendStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NEXT: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+
+// There should be no more occurrences of AppendStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NOT: {{[^[:alnum:]]}}AppendStructuredBuffer
+
+#ifndef EMPTY
+
+AppendStructuredBuffer<int> Buffer;
+
+#endif
+
+// CHECK: ClassTemplateDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit AppendStructuredBuffer
+// CHECK-NEXT: TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class depth 0 index 0 element_type
+// CHECK-NEXT: CXXRecordDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit class AppendStructuredBuffer definition
+
+// CHECK: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+// CHECK-NEXT: FieldDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit h '__hlsl_resource_t
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::raw_buffer]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::contained_type(element_type)]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: HLSLResourceAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit TypedBuffer
+
+// CHECK-NOT: CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> operator[] 'element_type &const (unsigned int) const'
+// CHECK-NOT: CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> operator[] 'element_type &(unsigned int)'
+
+// CHECK: ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class AppendStructuredBuffer definition
+// CHECK: TemplateArgument type 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: BuiltinType 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+// CHECK-NEXT: FieldDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit h '__hlsl_resource_t
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::raw_buffer]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::contained_type(int)]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: HLSLResourceAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit TypedBuffer
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/HLSL/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl b/clang/test/AST/HLSL/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..639aba6769b842
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/AST/HLSL/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-AST.hlsl
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-library -x hlsl -ast-dump -DEMPTY %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=EMPTY %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.0-library -x hlsl -ast-dump %s | FileCheck %s
+
+
+// This test tests two different AST generations. The "EMPTY" test mode verifies
+// the AST generated by forward declaration of the HLSL types which happens on
+// initializing the HLSL external AST with an AST Context.
+
+// The non-empty mode has a use that requires the ConsumeStructuredBuffer type be complete,
+// which results in the AST being populated by the external AST source. That
+// case covers the full implementation of the template declaration and the
+// instantiated specialization.
+
+// EMPTY: ClassTemplateDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit ConsumeStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NEXT: TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class depth 0 index 0 element_type
+// EMPTY-NEXT: CXXRecordDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit <undeserialized declarations> class ConsumeStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NEXT: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+
+// There should be no more occurrences of ConsumeStructuredBuffer
+// EMPTY-NOT: {{[^[:alnum:]]}}ConsumeStructuredBuffer
+
+#ifndef EMPTY
+
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<int> Buffer;
+
+#endif
+
+// CHECK: ClassTemplateDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit ConsumeStructuredBuffer
+// CHECK-NEXT: TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class depth 0 index 0 element_type
+// CHECK-NEXT: CXXRecordDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit class ConsumeStructuredBuffer definition
+
+// CHECK: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+// CHECK-NEXT: FieldDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit h '__hlsl_resource_t
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::raw_buffer]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::contained_type(element_type)]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: HLSLResourceAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit TypedBuffer
+
+// CHECK-NOT: CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> operator[] 'element_type &const (unsigned int) const'
+// CHECK-NOT: CXXMethodDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> operator[] 'element_type &(unsigned int)'
+
+// CHECK: ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class ConsumeStructuredBuffer definition
+
+// CHECK: TemplateArgument type 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: BuiltinType 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} 'int'
+// CHECK-NEXT: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final
+// CHECK-NEXT: FieldDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit h '__hlsl_resource_t
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::resource_class(UAV)]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::raw_buffer]]
+// CHECK-SAME{LITERAL}: [[hlsl::contained_type(int)]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: HLSLResourceAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit TypedBuffer
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/AppendStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/AppendStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..055b4a3e405b4e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/AppendStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.2-compute -finclude-default-header -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i16, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.0" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i16, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.1" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i32, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.2" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i32, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.3" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i64, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.4" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i64, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.5" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", half, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.6" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.7" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", double, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.8" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <4 x i16>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.9" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <3 x i32>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.10" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <2 x half>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer.11" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <3 x float>, 1, 0)
+
+AppendStructuredBuffer<int16_t> BufI16;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<uint16_t> BufU16;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<int> BufI32;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<uint> BufU32;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<int64_t> BufI64;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<uint64_t> BufU64;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<half> BufF16;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<float> BufF32;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<double> BufF64;
+AppendStructuredBuffer< vector<int16_t, 4> > BufI16x4;
+AppendStructuredBuffer< vector<uint, 3> > BufU32x3;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<half2> BufF16x2;
+AppendStructuredBuffer<float3> BufF32x3;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<snorm half> BufSNormF16;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<unorm half> BufUNormF16;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<snorm float> BufSNormF32;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<unorm float> BufUNormF32;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<snorm double> BufSNormF64;
+// TODO: AppendStructuredBuffer<unorm double> BufUNormF64;
+
+[numthreads(1,1,1)]
+void main(int GI : SV_GroupIndex) {
+}
+
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI16, i32 10, i32 2,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU16, i32 10, i32 3,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI32, i32 10, i32 4,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU32, i32 10, i32 5,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI64, i32 10, i32 6,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU64, i32 10, i32 7,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF16, i32 10, i32 8,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF32, i32 10, i32 9,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF64, i32 10, i32 10,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI16x4, i32 10, i32 2,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU32x3, i32 10, i32 5,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF16x2, i32 10, i32 8,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF32x3, i32 10, i32 9,
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..16d71e034ad3cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/ConsumeStructuredBuffer-elementtype.hlsl
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple dxil-pc-shadermodel6.2-compute -finclude-default-header -fnative-half-type -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i16, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.0" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i16, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.1" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i32, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.2" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i32, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.3" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i64, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.4" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", i64, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.5" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", half, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.6" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.7" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", double, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.8" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <4 x i16>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.9" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <3 x i32>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.10" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <2 x half>, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer.11" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", <3 x float>, 1, 0)
+
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<int16_t> BufI16;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<uint16_t> BufU16;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<int> BufI32;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<uint> BufU32;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<int64_t> BufI64;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<uint64_t> BufU64;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<half> BufF16;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<float> BufF32;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<double> BufF64;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer< vector<int16_t, 4> > BufI16x4;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer< vector<uint, 3> > BufU32x3;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<half2> BufF16x2;
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<float3> BufF32x3;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<snorm half> BufSNormF16;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<unorm half> BufUNormF16;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<snorm float> BufSNormF32;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<unorm float> BufUNormF32;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<snorm double> BufSNormF64;
+// TODO: ConsumeStructuredBuffer<unorm double> BufUNormF64;
+
+[numthreads(1,1,1)]
+void main(int GI : SV_GroupIndex) {
+}
+
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI16, i32 10, i32 2,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU16, i32 10, i32 3,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI32, i32 10, i32 4,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU32, i32 10, i32 5,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI64, i32 10, i32 6,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU64, i32 10, i32 7,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF16, i32 10, i32 8,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF32, i32 10, i32 9,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF64, i32 10, i32 10,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufI16x4, i32 10, i32 2,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufU32x3, i32 10, i32 5,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF16x2, i32 10, i32 8,
+// CHECK: !{{[0-9]+}} = !{ptr @BufF32x3, i32 10, i32 9,
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/StructuredBuffers-constructors.hlsl b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/StructuredBuffers-constructors.hlsl
index 4f2f8d079074da..3fc90f1877df3a 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/StructuredBuffers-constructors.hlsl
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenHLSL/builtins/StructuredBuffers-constructors.hlsl
@@ -5,17 +5,27 @@
StructuredBuffer<float> Buf : register(t10);
RWStructuredBuffer<float> Buf2 : register(u5, space1);
+AppendStructuredBuffer<float> Buf3 : register(u3);
+ConsumeStructuredBuffer<float> Buf4 : register(u4);
-// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::StructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0), float }
-// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::RWStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0), float }
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::StructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::RWStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0)
+// CHECK: %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer" = type { target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0)
// CHECK: @Buf = global %"class.hlsl::StructuredBuffer" zeroinitializer, align 4
// CHECK: @Buf2 = global %"class.hlsl::RWStructuredBuffer" zeroinitializer, align 4
+// CHECK: @Buf3 = global %"class.hlsl::AppendStructuredBuffer" zeroinitializer, align 4
+// CHECK: @Buf4 = global %"class.hlsl::ConsumeStructuredBuffer" zeroinitializer, align 4
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN4hlsl16StructuredBufferIfEC2Ev(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 dereferenceable(8) %this)
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN4hlsl18RWStructuredBufferIfEC2Ev(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 dereferenceable(8) %this)
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+// CHECK: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN4hlsl22AppendStructuredBufferIfEC2Ev(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 dereferenceable(4) %this)
+// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
+// CHECK: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN4hlsl23ConsumeStructuredBufferIfEC2Ev(ptr noundef nonnull align 4 dereferenceable(4) %this)
+// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK: define internal void @_GLOBAL__sub_I_StructuredBuffers_constructors.hlsl()
// CHECK: entry:
@@ -27,7 +37,16 @@ RWStructuredBuffer<float> Buf2 : register(u5, space1);
// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0) %Buf_h, ptr @Buf, align 4
// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: %Buf2_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) @llvm.dx.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 1, i32 5, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) %Buf2_h, ptr @Buf2, align 4
+// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: %Buf3_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) @llvm.dx.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 0, i32 3, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
+// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) %Buf3_h, ptr @Buf3, align 4
+// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: %Buf4_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) @llvm.dx.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
+// CHECK-DXIL-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) %Buf4_h, ptr @Buf4, align 4
+
// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: %Buf_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0) @llvm.spv.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_0_0t(i32 0, i32 10, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0) %Buf_h, ptr @Buf", align 4
// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: %Buf2_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) @llvm.spv.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 1, i32 5, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) %Buf2_h, ptr @Buf2", align 4
+// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: %Buf3_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0) @llvm.spv.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 0, i32 3, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
+// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 0, 0) %Buf3_h, ptr @Buf3, align 4
+// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: %Buf4_h = call target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) @llvm.spv.handle.fromBinding.tdx.RawBuffer_f32_1_0t(i32 0, i32 4, i32 1, i32 0, i1 false)
+// CHECK-SPIRV-NEXT: store target("dx.RawBuffer", float, 1, 0) %Buf4_h, ptr @Buf4, align 4
|
…into sb3-asb-csb
bob80905
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My other comment is just a nit, I can approve this as it is.
bogner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. I have a comment about the testing strategy in general but that can be addressed separately from this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not entirely convinced that these AST tests that are all more or less duplicates of each other are really worth it for every single buffer type. They aren't easy to read or update and they vary from one another by literally just a few characters. I wonder if we should have one AST test for buffers in general and a more limited set that makes sure we're not way off base for the types of buffer that aren't represented in that one...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I might be worth merging these tests into one, though I am not sure if we should have one for all buffers. I think it would be better to group them, like structured buffers, raw buffers, textures etc. We are also adding the AST for buffer methods to these tests, which will differ between buffers a lot.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Filled an issue to track: #115412
pow2clk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good overall. I am worried about that typedbuffer enum though. Perhaps it doesn't have much impact as of yet, but perhaps we need to change some conditionals to accept structuredbuffer enums where appropriate.
| // CHECK-NEXT: TemplateTypeParmDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> class depth 0 index 0 element_type | ||
| // CHECK-NEXT: CXXRecordDecl 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> <invalid sloc> implicit class AppendStructuredBuffer definition | ||
|
|
||
| // CHECK: FinalAttr 0x{{[0-9A-Fa-f]+}} <<invalid sloc>> Implicit final |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this one isn't on the next line in this form unlike the EMPTY case above?
pow2clk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for indulging me!
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
…SemaSource (llvm#113643) Adds `AppendStructuredBuffer` and `ConsumeStructuredBuffer` definition to HLSLExternalSemaSource. Adds separate tests for the AST shape and element types, and adds constructor/handle.fromBinding test case to shared test file for structured buffers. These buffers do not have any subscript operators. Append and Consume methods will be added later in llvm#112968. Fixes llvm#112777
Adds
AppendStructuredBufferandConsumeStructuredBufferdefinition to HLSLExternalSemaSource. Adds separate tests for the AST shape and element types, and adds constructor/handle.fromBinding test case to shared test file for structured buffers.These buffers do not have any subscript operators. Append and Consume methods will be added later in #112968.
Fixes #112777