-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.4k
[SelectionDAG] Simplify classof of MemSDNode and MemIntrinsicSDNode (NFC) #115720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
s-barannikov
merged 1 commit into
llvm:main
from
s-barannikov:simplify-is-mem-intrinsic
Nov 12, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Isn't this SDNodeBits part of a union? Isn't the opcode check to make sure that part of the union is active?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
structs other than
SDNodeBitfieldshave firstNumSDNodeBitsbits reserved.That is,
IsMemIntrinsicis shared between all structs in the union.I think the opcode check is a historical artifact.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that this opcode check doesn't really tell us which union member is active because
INTRINSIC_W_CHAIN/INTRINSIC_VOIDcan either be an ordinarySDNodeorMemIntrinsicSDNode. If I read the removed comment correctly, this bit was introduced to disambiguate these cases, but introducing it also made the opcode check redundant.Assuming there is no (pre-existing) undefined behavior, just checking the bit is more robust as the method will now return false for ordinary
SDNodes erroneously created withisTargetMemoryOpcodeopcodes.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the clarification.
I think that would be considered a bug to not use SDMemIntrinsicSDNode for anything that isTargetMemoryOpcode()