[mlir] fix copypaste typos in asserts #119878
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir Author: klensy (klensy) ChangesThis fixes few copypaste typos I've also spotted weird llvm-project/mlir/lib/Analysis/Presburger/Simplex.cpp Lines 107 to 111 in ea8e328 Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119878.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Interfaces/ValueBoundsOpInterface.cpp b/mlir/lib/Interfaces/ValueBoundsOpInterface.cpp
index 505e84e3ca0cf3..87f883c2e64850 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Interfaces/ValueBoundsOpInterface.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Interfaces/ValueBoundsOpInterface.cpp
@@ -777,11 +777,11 @@ FailureOr<bool>
ValueBoundsConstraintSet::areOverlappingSlices(MLIRContext *ctx,
HyperrectangularSlice slice1,
HyperrectangularSlice slice2) {
- assert(slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() == slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() == slice2.getMixedOffsets().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
- assert(slice1.getMixedSizes().size() == slice1.getMixedSizes().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedSizes().size() == slice2.getMixedSizes().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
- assert(slice1.getMixedStrides().size() == slice1.getMixedStrides().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedStrides().size() == slice2.getMixedStrides().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
Builder b(ctx);
@@ -842,11 +842,11 @@ FailureOr<bool>
ValueBoundsConstraintSet::areEquivalentSlices(MLIRContext *ctx,
HyperrectangularSlice slice1,
HyperrectangularSlice slice2) {
- assert(slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() == slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedOffsets().size() == slice2.getMixedOffsets().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
- assert(slice1.getMixedSizes().size() == slice1.getMixedSizes().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedSizes().size() == slice2.getMixedSizes().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
- assert(slice1.getMixedStrides().size() == slice1.getMixedStrides().size() &&
+ assert(slice1.getMixedStrides().size() == slice2.getMixedStrides().size() &&
"expected slices of same rank");
// The two slices are equivalent if all of their offsets, sizes and strides
|
klensy
changed the title
joker-eph
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes few copypaste typos
I've also spotted weird
getNumRows() == getNumRows(): looks like leftover after refactoringllvm-project/mlir/lib/Analysis/Presburger/Simplex.cpp
Lines 107 to 111 in ea8e328