Skip to content

Conversation

@optimisan
Copy link
Contributor

@optimisan optimisan commented Jan 10, 2025

No description provided.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jan 10, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu

Author: Akshat Oke (optimisan)

Changes

Since this is an IR pass, it could be tested as a standalone pass with opt - but it cannot be since the generic PassBuilder does not know about it in opt.

I tested if it is working in the new pipeline with llc by passing -stop-after=amdgpu-lower-enqueued-block.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122434.diff

5 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.h (+3-3)
  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.cpp (+28-9)
  • (added) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h (+23)
  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPassRegistry.def (+1)
  • (modified) llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUTargetMachine.cpp (+4-3)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.h b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.h
index b9769a1baf4d17..f7a7e48295ae5b 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.h
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPU.h
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ void initializeAMDGPUExternalAAWrapperPass(PassRegistry&);
 
 void initializeAMDGPUArgumentUsageInfoPass(PassRegistry &);
 
-ModulePass *createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass();
-void initializeAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass(PassRegistry &);
-extern char &AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringID;
+ModulePass *createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyPass();
+void initializeAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyPass(PassRegistry &);
+extern char &AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyID;
 
 void initializeGCNNSAReassignPass(PassRegistry &);
 extern char &GCNNSAReassignID;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.cpp
index 4f5ca08b46c139..fbd15ad176e3bd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.cpp
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 //
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
 
+#include "AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h"
 #include "AMDGPU.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
 #include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
@@ -48,11 +49,16 @@ using namespace llvm;
 namespace {
 
 /// Lower enqueued blocks.
-class AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering : public ModulePass {
+class AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering {
+public:
+  bool run(Module &M);
+};
+
+class AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy : public ModulePass {
 public:
   static char ID;
 
-  explicit AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering() : ModulePass(ID) {}
+  explicit AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy() : ModulePass(ID) {}
 
 private:
   bool runOnModule(Module &M) override;
@@ -60,19 +66,32 @@ class AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering : public ModulePass {
 
 } // end anonymous namespace
 
-char AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering::ID = 0;
+char AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy::ID = 0;
 
-char &llvm::AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringID =
-    AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering::ID;
+char &llvm::AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyID =
+    AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy::ID;
 
-INITIALIZE_PASS(AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering, DEBUG_TYPE,
+INITIALIZE_PASS(AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy, DEBUG_TYPE,
                 "Lower OpenCL enqueued blocks", false, false)
 
-ModulePass* llvm::createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass() {
-  return new AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering();
+ModulePass *llvm::createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyPass() {
+  return new AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy();
+}
+
+bool AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacy::runOnModule(Module &M) {
+  AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering Impl;
+  return Impl.run(M);
+}
+
+PreservedAnalyses
+AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass::run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &) {
+  AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering Impl;
+  if (Impl.run(M))
+    return PreservedAnalyses::none();
+  return PreservedAnalyses::all();
 }
 
-bool AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering::runOnModule(Module &M) {
+bool AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering::run(Module &M) {
   DenseSet<Function *> Callers;
   auto &C = M.getContext();
   bool Changed = false;
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..16ed7c18d8523e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+//===- AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h -----------------------*- C++-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#ifndef LLVM_LIB_TARGET_AMDGPU_OPENCLENQUEUEDBLOCKLOWERING_H
+#define LLVM_LIB_TARGET_AMDGPU_OPENCLENQUEUEDBLOCKLOWERING_H
+
+#include "llvm/IR/PassManager.h"
+
+namespace llvm {
+class AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass
+    : public PassInfoMixin<AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass> {
+public:
+  AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass() = default;
+  PreservedAnalyses run(Module &M, ModuleAnalysisManager &MAM);
+};
+} // namespace llvm
+
+#endif // LLVM_LIB_TARGET_AMDGPU_OPENCLENQUEUEDBLOCKLOWERING_H
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPassRegistry.def b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPassRegistry.def
index 182e825a59a41b..1e04f30fa3e7dc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPassRegistry.def
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUPassRegistry.def
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-buffer-fat-pointers",
 MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-ctor-dtor", AMDGPUCtorDtorLoweringPass())
 MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-sw-lower-lds", AMDGPUSwLowerLDSPass(*this))
 MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-module-lds", AMDGPULowerModuleLDSPass(*this))
+MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-enqueued-block", AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass())
 MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-perf-hint",
             AMDGPUPerfHintAnalysisPass(
               *static_cast<const GCNTargetMachine *>(this)))
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUTargetMachine.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUTargetMachine.cpp
index 7256eec89008a5..2cba3860cfce09 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUTargetMachine.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUTargetMachine.cpp
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include "AMDGPUIGroupLP.h"
 #include "AMDGPUISelDAGToDAG.h"
 #include "AMDGPUMacroFusion.h"
+#include "AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering.h"
 #include "AMDGPUPerfHintAnalysis.h"
 #include "AMDGPUSplitModule.h"
 #include "AMDGPUTargetObjectFile.h"
@@ -499,7 +500,7 @@ extern "C" LLVM_EXTERNAL_VISIBILITY void LLVMInitializeAMDGPUTarget() {
   initializeAMDGPULowerKernelArgumentsPass(*PR);
   initializeAMDGPUPromoteKernelArgumentsPass(*PR);
   initializeAMDGPULowerKernelAttributesPass(*PR);
-  initializeAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass(*PR);
+  initializeAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyPass(*PR);
   initializeAMDGPUPostLegalizerCombinerPass(*PR);
   initializeAMDGPUPreLegalizerCombinerPass(*PR);
   initializeAMDGPURegBankCombinerPass(*PR);
@@ -1172,7 +1173,7 @@ void AMDGPUPassConfig::addIRPasses() {
     addPass(createR600OpenCLImageTypeLoweringPass());
 
   // Replace OpenCL enqueued block function pointers with global variables.
-  addPass(createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass());
+  addPass(createAMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringLegacyPass());
 
   // Lower LDS accesses to global memory pass if address sanitizer is enabled.
   if (EnableSwLowerLDS)
@@ -1939,7 +1940,7 @@ void AMDGPUCodeGenPassBuilder::addIRPasses(AddIRPass &addPass) const {
   addPass(AMDGPUAlwaysInlinePass());
   addPass(AlwaysInlinerPass());
 
-  // TODO: Missing OpenCLEnqueuedBlockLowering
+  addPass(AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass());
 
   // Runs before PromoteAlloca so the latter can account for function uses
   if (EnableLowerModuleLDS)

@optimisan optimisan requested review from arsenm and cdevadas January 10, 2025 09:46
@arsenm
Copy link
Contributor

arsenm commented Jan 10, 2025

Since this is an IR pass, it could be tested as a standalone pass with opt - but it cannot be since the generic PassBuilder does not know about it in opt.

It can be tested, we already test many backend IR passes this way

@optimisan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh I see, I did not mention the target triple. Updating the test.

AMDGPULowerBufferFatPointersPass(*this))
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-ctor-dtor", AMDGPUCtorDtorLoweringPass())
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-sw-lower-lds", AMDGPUSwLowerLDSPass(*this))
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-enqueued-block", AMDGPUOpenCLEnqueuedBlockLoweringPass())
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

amdgpu-sw-lower-lds isn't in alphabetical order but that's already wrong

MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-buffer-fat-pointers",
AMDGPULowerBufferFatPointersPass(*this))
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-lower-ctor-dtor", AMDGPUCtorDtorLoweringPass())
MODULE_PASS("amdgpu-sw-lower-lds", AMDGPUSwLowerLDSPass(*this))
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should move this down in a separate PR.

@optimisan optimisan merged commit 73b0e8a into llvm:main Jan 13, 2025
8 checks passed
@llvm-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

llvm-ci commented Jan 13, 2025

LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian running on gribozavr4 while building llvm at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-all".

Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/11876

Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference
Step 6 (test-build-unified-tree-check-all) failure: test (failure)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: tools/llvm-gsymutil/ARM_AArch64/macho-merged-funcs-dwarf.yaml' FAILED ********************
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stdout):
--
Input file: /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/test/tools/llvm-gsymutil/ARM_AArch64/Output/macho-merged-funcs-dwarf.yaml.tmp.dSYM
Output file (aarch64): /b/1/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-debian/build/test/tools/llvm-gsymutil/ARM_AArch64/Output/macho-merged-funcs-dwarf.yaml.tmp.default.gSYM
Loaded 3 functions from DWARF.
Loaded 3 functions from symbol table.
warning: same address range contains different debug info. Removing:
[0x0000000000000248 - 0x0000000000000270): Name=0x00000047
addr=0x0000000000000248, file=  3, line=  5
addr=0x0000000000000254, file=  3, line=  7
addr=0x0000000000000258, file=  3, line=  9
addr=0x000000000000025c, file=  3, line=  8
addr=0x0000000000000260, file=  3, line= 11
addr=0x0000000000000264, file=  3, line= 10
addr=0x0000000000000268, file=  3, line=  6


In favor of this one:
[0x0000000000000248 - 0x0000000000000270): Name=0x00000030
addr=0x0000000000000248, file=  2, line=  5
addr=0x0000000000000254, file=  2, line=  7
addr=0x0000000000000258, file=  2, line=  9
addr=0x000000000000025c, file=  2, line=  8
addr=0x0000000000000260, file=  2, line= 11
addr=0x0000000000000264, file=  2, line= 10
addr=0x0000000000000268, file=  2, line=  6


warning: same address range contains different debug info. Removing:
[0x0000000000000248 - 0x0000000000000270): Name=0x00000030
addr=0x0000000000000248, file=  2, line=  5
addr=0x0000000000000254, file=  2, line=  7
addr=0x0000000000000258, file=  2, line=  9
addr=0x000000000000025c, file=  2, line=  8
addr=0x0000000000000260, file=  2, line= 11
addr=0x0000000000000264, file=  2, line= 10
addr=0x0000000000000268, file=  2, line=  6


In favor of this one:
[0x0000000000000248 - 0x0000000000000270): Name=0x00000001
addr=0x0000000000000248, file=  1, line=  5
addr=0x0000000000000254, file=  1, line=  7
addr=0x0000000000000258, file=  1, line=  9
addr=0x000000000000025c, file=  1, line=  8
addr=0x0000000000000260, file=  1, line= 11
addr=0x0000000000000264, file=  1, line= 10
...

kazutakahirata pushed a commit to kazutakahirata/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants