Skip to content

Conversation

@boomanaiden154
Copy link
Contributor

More people have been interested in exegesis recently, so having a point of contact would probably be good. Exegesis also never had proper code owners in the previous system, so adding them now is a decent step forward.

I'm nominating myself as I'm interested in pushing the project further, and have a decent amount of experience with the code base. Two of the original authors, Clement and Guillaume, now have different priorities at work and are thus not as invested into maintaining exegesis anymore.

More people have been interested in exegesis recently, so having a point
of contact would probably be good. Exegesis also never had proper code
owners in the previous system, so adding them now is a decent step
forward.

I'm nominating myself as I'm interested in pushing the project further,
and have a decent amount of experience with the code base. Two of the
original authors, Clement and Guillaume, now have different priorities
at work and are thus not as invested into maintaining exegesis anymore.
Copy link
Collaborator

@RKSimon RKSimon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well deserved - good luck!

@boomanaiden154 boomanaiden154 merged commit 7054655 into llvm:main Mar 17, 2025
12 checks passed
@boomanaiden154 boomanaiden154 deleted the exegesis-maintainers-3-17-25 branch March 17, 2025 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants