Skip to content

Conversation

@Sunday111
Copy link
Contributor

[compiler-rt] The test addtf3_test.c is currently guarded by #if defined(CRT_HAS_IEEE_TF), a macro that is declared in int_lib.h. However, int_lib.h is included after the preprocessor check, which results in the macro not being defined in time and causes the test to always be skipped.

This patch moves the includes of fp_test.h and int_lib.h to the top of the file so that CRT_HAS_IEEE_TF is defined before it is checked.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

The test `addtf3_test.c` is currently guarded by `#if defined(CRT_HAS_IEEE_TF)`,
a macro that is declared in `int_lib.h`. However, `int_lib.h` is included *after*
the preprocessor check, which results in the macro not being defined in time
and causes the test to always be skipped.

This patch moves the includes of `fp_test.h` and `int_lib.h` to the top of the
file so that `CRT_HAS_IEEE_TF` is defined before it is checked.
@Sunday111 Sunday111 force-pushed the fix-test-compiler-rt branch from cdb9952 to 2b140e9 Compare April 4, 2025 11:54
@Sunday111
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sunday111 commented Apr 9, 2025

Hello @pranavk, could you please take a look at this?

@pranavk pranavk self-requested a review April 14, 2025 17:37
Copy link
Contributor

@pranavk pranavk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't verify the new hexadecimal uint64 hi and lo numbers but assuming they are correct, LGTM

@Sunday111
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @pranavk . Thank you for your approval.
Is there anything else to be done to get it merged?
If no could you please merge this - I don't have commit access here.

@pranavk pranavk merged commit 72506eb into llvm:main Apr 16, 2025
10 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

@Sunday111 Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants