Skip to content

Conversation

@tbaederr
Copy link
Contributor

@tbaederr tbaederr commented May 1, 2025

The corresponding test in test/SemaCXX has a line using the bytecode interpreter these days.

The corresponding test in `test/SemaCXX` has a line using the bytecode
interpreter these days.
@llvmbot llvmbot added clang Clang issues not falling into any other category clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter labels May 1, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 1, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

Changes

The corresponding test in test/SemaCXX has a line using the bytecode interpreter these days.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138080.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (removed) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/constexpr-subobj-initialization.cpp (-67)
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/constexpr-subobj-initialization.cpp b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/constexpr-subobj-initialization.cpp
deleted file mode 100644
index 1a35994944190..0000000000000
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/constexpr-subobj-initialization.cpp
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
-
-/// This is like the version in test/SemaCXX/, but some of the
-/// output types and their location has been adapted.
-/// Differences:
-///   1) The type of the uninitialized base class is printed WITH the namespace,
-///      i.e. 'baseclass_uninit::DelBase' instead of just 'DelBase'.
-
-
-namespace baseclass_uninit {
-struct DelBase {
-  constexpr DelBase() = delete; // expected-note {{'DelBase' has been explicitly marked deleted here}}
-};
-
-struct Foo : DelBase { // expected-note 2{{constructor of base class 'baseclass_uninit::DelBase' is not called}}
-  constexpr Foo() {}; // expected-error {{call to deleted constructor of 'DelBase'}}
-};
-constexpr Foo f; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
-
-struct Bar : Foo {
-  constexpr Bar() {};
-};
-constexpr Bar bar; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
-
-struct Base {};
-struct A : Base { // expected-note {{constructor of base class 'baseclass_uninit::Base' is not called}}
-  constexpr A() : value() {} // expected-error {{member initializer 'value' does not name a non-static data member or base class}}
-};
-
-constexpr A a; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
-
-
-struct B : Base { // expected-note {{constructor of base class 'baseclass_uninit::Base' is not called}}
-  constexpr B() : {} // expected-error {{expected class member or base class name}}
-};
-
-constexpr B b; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
-} // namespace baseclass_uninit
-
-
-struct Foo {
-  constexpr Foo(); // expected-note 2{{declared here}}
-};
-
-constexpr Foo ff; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
-                  // expected-note {{undefined constructor 'Foo' cannot be used in a constant expression}}
-
-struct Bar : protected Foo {
-  int i;
-  constexpr Bar() : i(12) {} // expected-note {{undefined constructor 'Foo' cannot be used in a constant expression}}
-};
-
-constexpr Bar bb; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
-                  // expected-note {{in call to 'Bar()'}}
-
-template <typename Ty>
-struct Baz {
-  constexpr Baz(); // expected-note {{declared here}}
-};
-
-struct Quux : Baz<Foo>, private Bar {
-  int i;
-  constexpr Quux() : i(12) {} // expected-note {{undefined constructor 'Baz' cannot be used in a constant expression}}
-};
-
-constexpr Quux qx; // expected-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
-                   // expected-note {{in call to 'Quux()'}}

@tbaederr tbaederr merged commit d0a9727 into llvm:main May 1, 2025
14 checks passed
IanWood1 pushed a commit to IanWood1/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
The corresponding test in `test/SemaCXX` has a line using the bytecode
interpreter these days.
GeorgeARM pushed a commit to GeorgeARM/llvm-project that referenced this pull request May 7, 2025
The corresponding test in `test/SemaCXX` has a line using the bytecode
interpreter these days.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

clang:bytecode Issues for the clang bytecode constexpr interpreter clang Clang issues not falling into any other category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants