[VPlan] Simplify branch on False in VPlan transform (NFC).

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/LoopVectorize.cpp

@@ -2380,10 +2380,13 @@ void InnerLoopVectorizer::introduceCheckBlockInVPlan(BasicBlock *CheckIRBB) {
 
   // We just connected a new block to the scalar preheader. Update all
   // VPPhis by adding an incoming value for it, replicating the last value.
+  unsigned NumPredecessors = ScalarPH->getNumPredecessors();
+  (void)NumPredecessors;
   for (VPRecipeBase &R : cast<VPBasicBlock>(ScalarPH)->phis()) {
-    auto *ResumePhi = cast<VPPhi>(&R);
-    ResumePhi->addOperand(
-        ResumePhi->getOperand(ResumePhi->getNumOperands() - 1));
+    assert(isa<VPPhi>(&R) && "Phi expected to be VPPhi");
+    assert(cast<VPPhi>(&R)->getNumIncoming() == NumPredecessors - 1 &&
+           "must have incoming values for all operands");
+    R.addOperand(R.getOperand(NumPredecessors - 2));
   }
 }
 

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlan.h

@@ -1122,6 +1122,10 @@ class VPPhiAccessors {
     return getAsRecipe()->getNumOperands();
   }
 
+  /// Removes the incoming value for \p IncomingBlock, which must be a
+  /// predecessor.
+  void removeIncomingValueFor(VPBlockBase *IncomingBlock) const;
+
 #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
   /// Print the recipe.
   void printPhiOperands(raw_ostream &O, VPSlotTracker &SlotTracker) const;
@@ -3526,22 +3530,22 @@ class VPScalarIVStepsRecipe : public VPRecipeWithIRFlags,
 
 /// Casting from VPRecipeBase -> VPPhiAccessors is supported for all recipe
 /// types implementing VPPhiAccessors. Used by isa<> & co.
-template <> struct CastIsPossible<VPPhiAccessors, const VPRecipeBase *> {
-  static inline bool isPossible(const VPRecipeBase *f) {
+template <typename SrcTy> struct CastIsPossible<VPPhiAccessors, SrcTy> {
+  static inline bool isPossible(SrcTy f) {
     // TODO: include VPPredInstPHIRecipe too, once it implements VPPhiAccessors.
     return isa<VPIRPhi, VPHeaderPHIRecipe, VPWidenPHIRecipe, VPPhi>(f);
   }
 };
 /// Support casting from VPRecipeBase -> VPPhiAccessors, by down-casting to the
 /// recipe types implementing VPPhiAccessors. Used by cast<>, dyn_cast<> & co.
-template <>
-struct CastInfo<VPPhiAccessors, const VPRecipeBase *>
-    : public CastIsPossible<VPPhiAccessors, const VPRecipeBase *> {
+template <typename SrcTy>
+struct CastInfo<VPPhiAccessors, SrcTy>
+    : public CastIsPossible<VPPhiAccessors, SrcTy> {
 
-  using Self = CastInfo<VPPhiAccessors, const VPRecipeBase *>;
+  using Self = CastInfo<VPPhiAccessors, SrcTy>;
 
   /// doCast is used by cast<>.
-  static inline VPPhiAccessors *doCast(const VPRecipeBase *R) {
+  static inline VPPhiAccessors *doCast(SrcTy R) {
     return const_cast<VPPhiAccessors *>([R]() -> const VPPhiAccessors * {
       switch (R->getVPDefID()) {
       case VPDef::VPInstructionSC:
@@ -3557,7 +3561,7 @@ struct CastInfo<VPPhiAccessors, const VPRecipeBase *>
   }
 
   /// doCastIfPossible is used by dyn_cast<>.
-  static inline VPPhiAccessors *doCastIfPossible(const VPRecipeBase *f) {
+  static inline VPPhiAccessors *doCastIfPossible(SrcTy f) {
     if (!Self::isPossible(f))
       return nullptr;
     return doCast(f);

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanConstruction.cpp

@@ -501,8 +501,10 @@ void VPlanTransforms::prepareForVectorization(
                                    cast<VPBasicBlock>(HeaderVPB),
                                    cast<VPBasicBlock>(LatchVPB), Range);
         HandledUncountableEarlyExit = true;
+      } else {
+        for (VPRecipeBase &R : EB->phis())
+          cast<VPIRPhi>(&R)->removeIncomingValueFor(Pred);
       }
-
       cast<VPBasicBlock>(Pred)->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
       VPBlockUtils::disconnectBlocks(Pred, EB);
     }
@@ -526,32 +528,6 @@ void VPlanTransforms::prepareForVectorization(
   VPBasicBlock *ScalarPH = Plan.createVPBasicBlock("scalar.ph");
   VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(ScalarPH, Plan.getScalarHeader());
 
-  // If needed, add a check in the middle block to see if we have completed
-  // all of the iterations in the first vector loop.  Three cases:
-  // 1) If we require a scalar epilogue, there is no conditional branch as
-  //    we unconditionally branch to the scalar preheader.  Remove the recipes
-  //    from the exit blocks.
-  // 2) If (N - N%VF) == N, then we *don't* need to run the remainder.
-  //    Thus if tail is to be folded, we know we don't need to run the
-  //    remainder and we can set the condition to true.
-  // 3) Otherwise, construct a runtime check.
-
-  if (!RequiresScalarEpilogueCheck) {
-    if (auto *LatchExitVPB = MiddleVPBB->getSingleSuccessor())
-      VPBlockUtils::disconnectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, LatchExitVPB);
-    VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, ScalarPH);
-    VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(Plan.getEntry(), ScalarPH);
-    Plan.getEntry()->swapSuccessors();
-
-    // The exit blocks are unreachable, remove their recipes to make sure no
-    // users remain that may pessimize transforms.
-    for (auto *EB : Plan.getExitBlocks()) {
-      for (VPRecipeBase &R : make_early_inc_range(*EB))
-        R.eraseFromParent();
-    }
-    return;
-  }
-
   // The connection order corresponds to the operands of the conditional branch,
   // with the middle block already connected to the exit block.
   VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(MiddleVPBB, ScalarPH);
@@ -561,21 +537,45 @@ void VPlanTransforms::prepareForVectorization(
   VPBlockUtils::connectBlocks(Plan.getEntry(), ScalarPH);
   Plan.getEntry()->swapSuccessors();
 
-  auto *ScalarLatchTerm = TheLoop->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
-  // Here we use the same DebugLoc as the scalar loop latch terminator instead
-  // of the corresponding compare because they may have ended up with
-  // different line numbers and we want to avoid awkward line stepping while
-  // debugging. Eg. if the compare has got a line number inside the loop.
+  // If MiddleVPBB has a single successor then the original loop does not exit
+  // via the latch and the single successor must be the scalar preheader.
+  // There's no need to add a runtime check to MiddleVPBB.
+  if (MiddleVPBB->getNumSuccessors() == 1) {
+    assert(MiddleVPBB->getSingleSuccessor() == ScalarPH &&
+           "must have ScalarPH as single successor");
+    return;
+  }
+
+  assert(MiddleVPBB->getNumSuccessors() == 2 && "must have 2 successors");
+
+  // Add a check in the middle block to see if we have completed$ all of the
+  // iterations in the first vector loop.
+  //
+  // Three cases:
+  // 1) If we require a scalar epilogue, the scalar ph must execute. Set the
+  //    condition to false.
+  // 2) If (N - N%VF) == N, then we *don't* need to run the
+  //    remainder. Thus if tail is to be folded, we know we don't need to run
+  //    the remainder and we can set the condition to true.
+  // 3) Otherwise, construct a runtime check.
+
+  // We use the same DebugLoc as the scalar loop latch terminator instead of
+  // the corresponding compare because they may have ended up with different
+  // line numbers and we want to avoid awkward line stepping while debugging.
+  // E.g., if the compare has got a line number inside the loop.
+  DebugLoc LatchDL = TheLoop->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator()->getDebugLoc();
   VPBuilder Builder(MiddleVPBB);
-  VPValue *Cmp =
-      TailFolded
-          ? Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getTrue(
-                IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext())))
-          : Builder.createICmp(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Plan.getTripCount(),
-                               &Plan.getVectorTripCount(),
-                               ScalarLatchTerm->getDebugLoc(), "cmp.n");
-  Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::BranchOnCond, {Cmp},
-                       ScalarLatchTerm->getDebugLoc());
+  VPValue *Cmp;
+  if (!RequiresScalarEpilogueCheck)
+    Cmp = Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getFalse(
+        IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext())));
+  else if (TailFolded)
+    Cmp = Plan.getOrAddLiveIn(ConstantInt::getTrue(
+        IntegerType::getInt1Ty(TripCount->getType()->getContext())));
+  else
+    Cmp = Builder.createICmp(CmpInst::ICMP_EQ, Plan.getTripCount(),
+                             &Plan.getVectorTripCount(), LatchDL, "cmp.n");
+  Builder.createNaryOp(VPInstruction::BranchOnCond, {Cmp}, LatchDL);
 }
 
 void VPlanTransforms::createLoopRegions(VPlan &Plan) {

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanRecipes.cpp

@@ -1185,6 +1185,16 @@ void VPIRPhi::execute(VPTransformState &State) {
   State.Builder.SetInsertPoint(Phi->getParent(), std::next(Phi->getIterator()));
 }
 
+void VPPhiAccessors::removeIncomingValueFor(VPBlockBase *IncomingBlock) const {
+  VPRecipeBase *R = const_cast<VPRecipeBase *>(getAsRecipe());
+  auto &Preds = R->getParent()->getPredecessors();
+  assert(R->getNumOperands() == Preds.size() &&
+         "Number of phi operands must match number of predecessors");
+  unsigned Position = std::distance(Preds.begin(), find(Preds, IncomingBlock));
+  R->getOperand(Position)->removeUser(*R);
+  R->removeOperand(Position);
+}
+
 #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
 void VPPhiAccessors::printPhiOperands(raw_ostream &O,
                                       VPSlotTracker &SlotTracker) const {

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanTransforms.cpp

@@ -1841,43 +1841,39 @@ void VPlanTransforms::truncateToMinimalBitwidths(
   }
 }
 
-/// Remove BranchOnCond recipes with true conditions together with removing
-/// dead edges to their successors.
-static void removeBranchOnCondTrue(VPlan &Plan) {
+/// Remove BranchOnCond recipes with true or false conditions together with
+/// removing dead edges to their successors.
+static void removeBranchOnConst(VPlan &Plan) {
   using namespace llvm::VPlanPatternMatch;
   for (VPBasicBlock *VPBB : VPBlockUtils::blocksOnly<VPBasicBlock>(
            vp_depth_first_shallow(Plan.getEntry()))) {
+    VPValue *Cond;
     if (VPBB->getNumSuccessors() != 2 || VPBB == Plan.getEntry() ||
-        !match(&VPBB->back(), m_BranchOnCond(m_True())))
+        !match(&VPBB->back(), m_BranchOnCond(m_VPValue(Cond))))
       continue;
 
-    VPBasicBlock *RemovedSucc = cast<VPBasicBlock>(VPBB->getSuccessors()[1]);
+    unsigned RemovedIdx;
+    if (match(Cond, m_True()))
+      RemovedIdx = 1;
+    else if (match(Cond, m_False()))
+      RemovedIdx = 0;
+    else
+      continue;
+
+    VPBasicBlock *RemovedSucc =
+        cast<VPBasicBlock>(VPBB->getSuccessors()[RemovedIdx]);
     const auto &Preds = RemovedSucc->getPredecessors();
     assert(count(Preds, VPBB) == 1 &&
            "There must be a single edge between VPBB and its successor");
-    unsigned DeadIdx = std::distance(Preds.begin(), find(Preds, VPBB));
-
-    // Values coming from VPBB into ResumePhi recipes of RemoveSucc are removed
-    // from these recipes.
+    // Values coming from VPBB into phi recipes of RemoveSucc are removed from
+    // these recipes.
     for (VPRecipeBase &R : make_early_inc_range(*RemovedSucc)) {
-      assert((!isa<VPIRInstruction>(&R) ||
-              !isa<PHINode>(cast<VPIRInstruction>(&R)->getInstruction())) &&
-             !isa<VPHeaderPHIRecipe>(&R) &&
-             "Cannot update VPIRInstructions wrapping phis or header phis yet");
-      auto *VPI = dyn_cast<VPPhi>(&R);
-      if (!VPI)
+      auto *Phi = dyn_cast<VPPhiAccessors>(&R);
+      if (!Phi)
         break;
-      VPBuilder B(VPI);
-      SmallVector<VPValue *> NewOperands;
-      // Create new operand list, with the dead incoming value filtered out.
-      for (const auto &[Idx, Op] : enumerate(VPI->operands())) {
-        if (Idx == DeadIdx)
-          continue;
-        NewOperands.push_back(Op);
-      }
-      VPI->replaceAllUsesWith(
-          B.createScalarPhi(NewOperands, VPI->getDebugLoc(), VPI->getName()));
-      VPI->eraseFromParent();
+      assert((!isa<VPIRPhi>(&R) || RemovedSucc->getNumPredecessors() == 1) &&
+             "VPIRPhis must have a single predecessor");
+      Phi->removeIncomingValueFor(VPBB);
     }
     // Disconnect blocks and remove the terminator. RemovedSucc will be deleted
     // automatically on VPlan destruction if it becomes unreachable.
@@ -1897,7 +1893,7 @@ void VPlanTransforms::optimize(VPlan &Plan) {
   runPass(legalizeAndOptimizeInductions, Plan);
   runPass(removeRedundantExpandSCEVRecipes, Plan);
   runPass(simplifyRecipes, Plan, *Plan.getCanonicalIV()->getScalarType());
-  runPass(removeBranchOnCondTrue, Plan);
+  runPass(removeBranchOnConst, Plan);
   runPass(removeDeadRecipes, Plan);
 
   runPass(createAndOptimizeReplicateRegions, Plan);

llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/VPlanValue.h

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ class VPSlotTracker;
 class VPUser;
 class VPRecipeBase;
 class VPInterleaveRecipe;
+class VPPhiAccessors;
 
 // This is the base class of the VPlan Def/Use graph, used for modeling the data
 // flow into, within and out of the VPlan. VPValues can stand for live-ins
@@ -199,8 +200,13 @@ raw_ostream &operator<<(raw_ostream &OS, const VPRecipeBase &R);
 /// This class augments VPValue with operands which provide the inverse def-use
 /// edges from VPValue's users to their defs.
 class VPUser {
+  /// Grant access to removeOperand for VPPhiAccessors, the only supported user.
+  friend class VPPhiAccessors;
+
   SmallVector<VPValue *, 2> Operands;
 
+  void removeOperand(unsigned Idx) { Operands.erase(Operands.begin() + Idx); }
+
 protected:
 #if !defined(NDEBUG) || defined(LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP)
   /// Print the operands to \p O.