Skip to content

[CIR] Extend VecShuffleOp verifier to catch invalid index #143262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

[CIR] Extend VecShuffleOp verifier to catch invalid index #143262

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
5f98861
[CIR] Extend VecShuffleOp verifier to catch invalid index
AmrDeveloper Jun 7, 2025
abe1bc9
ix the index constraint to accept -1 as valid index
AmrDeveloper Jun 8, 2025
573e7ca
Replace for loop with llvm::any_of
AmrDeveloper Jun 9, 2025
ca7722d
Keep braces
AmrDeveloper Jun 13, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 8 additions & 0 deletions clang/lib/CIR/Dialect/IR/CIRDialect.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1599,6 +1599,14 @@ LogicalResult cir::VecShuffleOp::verify() {
<< " and " << getResult().getType() << " don't match";
}

const uint64_t maxValidIndex =
getVec1().getType().getSize() + getVec2().getType().getSize() - 1;
for (const auto &idxAttr : getIndices().getAsRange<cir::IntAttr>()) {
Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes Jun 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe replace the for here by

if (llvm::any_of(getIndices().getAsRange<cir::IntAttr>(),
   [&](cir::IntAttr idxAttr) {
     return idxAttr.getSInt() != -1 && idxAttr.getUInt() > maxValidIndex;
   }) emitError(...);

if (idxAttr.getSInt() != -1 && idxAttr.getUInt() > maxValidIndex)
return emitOpError() << ": index for __builtin_shufflevector must be "
"less than the total number of vector elements";
}

return success();
}

Expand Down
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions clang/test/CIR/IR/invalid-vector-shuffle-wrong-index.cir
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
// RUN: cir-opt %s -verify-diagnostics -split-input-file

!s32i = !cir.int<s, 32>
!s64i = !cir.int<s, 64>

module {
cir.func @fold_shuffle_vector_op_test() -> !cir.vector<4 x !s32i> {
%vec_1 = cir.const #cir.const_vector<[#cir.int<1> : !s32i, #cir.int<3> : !s32i, #cir.int<5> : !s32i, #cir.int<7> : !s32i]> : !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>
%vec_2 = cir.const #cir.const_vector<[#cir.int<2> : !s32i, #cir.int<4> : !s32i, #cir.int<6> : !s32i, #cir.int<8> : !s32i]> : !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>

// expected-error @below {{index for __builtin_shufflevector must be less than the total number of vector elements}}
%new_vec = cir.vec.shuffle(%vec_1, %vec_2 : !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>) [#cir.int<9> : !s64i, #cir.int<4> : !s64i,
#cir.int<1> : !s64i, #cir.int<5> : !s64i] : !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>
cir.return %new_vec : !cir.vector<4 x !s32i>
}
}