Skip to content

Conversation

@dwblaikie
Copy link
Collaborator

Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.

Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.
@dwblaikie dwblaikie changed the title Potential quick fix for PR141106 Potential quick fix for #141106 Jun 25, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Jun 25, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo

Author: David Blaikie (dwblaikie)

Changes

Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145797.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (renamed) llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll ()
diff --git a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/dynamic-bitfield.ll b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll
similarity index 100%
rename from llvm/test/DebugInfo/dynamic-bitfield.ll
rename to llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll

@vvereschaka
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @dwblaikie ,

I have tested these changes for NVPTX builders. The dynamic-bitfield.ll test has passed successfully there.

-- Testing: 1 of 59774 tests, 1 workers --
PASS: LLVM :: DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll (1 of 1)
Slowest Tests:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.06s: LLVM :: DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll

@nikic nikic changed the title Potential quick fix for #141106 [DebugInfo] Specify x86_64 triple for test Jun 26, 2025
@nikic nikic merged commit 96ed2ab into llvm:main Jun 26, 2025
7 checks passed
anthonyhatran pushed a commit to anthonyhatran/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants