-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[IA][RISCV] Recognizing gap masks assembled from bitwise AND #153324
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
mshockwave
merged 2 commits into
llvm:main
from
mshockwave:patch/strided-interleaved-accessed-combined-mask
Aug 14, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this works as written. Consider the case where MaskLHS has segment 3 inactive, and the and mask has segment 2 inactive. Reporting only segment 2 would be wrong wouldn't it? I think you need to merge the gap masks.
Edit: This isn't a correctness issue, it's a missed optimization.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are two cases where the gap mask from the LHS would not be all-ones: (1) LHS is a constant mask (2) LHS is also a mask assembled by AND.
For case (1), I think constant folding should already handle that (hence the assertion in the line above); for case (2), namely "multi-layer" bitwise AND, I think constant folding should also take care of it and turn it into a single layer AND with LHS being non-constant and RHS being a constant.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Constant folded by InstCombine or something in this pass?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
InstCombine
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it is a good idea to make assumptions about what earlier passes will do. We don't have to produce optimal code if both operands are constants or the constant is on the left hand side instead of the right. But we cannot write an assert that says it will not happen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's a fair point. I've updated the patch to make the logics more general: now it will try to merge both the deinterleaved masks and the gap masks from LHS & RHS.