-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.2k
[CIR] Fix access to bitfields inside a union #154398
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -28,3 +28,44 @@ typedef union { | |||||
|
|
||||||
| demo d; | ||||||
| zero_bit z; | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| int main() { | ||||||
|
||||||
| int main() { | |
| void f() { |
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is index ever non-zero for unions? I see that the incubator only checks
if (index == 0)here and returnsbase.getAddress()in that case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, in the incubator we handled it that way, but in this discussion we decided to remove that:
#145971 (comment)
As for “Is index ever non-zero for unions?”, the answer is no we always get zero for bitfields in unions, because of here:
llvm-project/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExpr.cpp
Lines 394 to 395 in 9627944
llvm-project/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenRecordLayoutBuilder.cpp
Lines 707 to 709 in 961b052
One thing to note is that when loading a non-bitfield, it does receive an index different from 0:
https://godbolt.org/z/vMTc74Go1
That index comes from here:
llvm-project/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExpr.cpp
Lines 436 to 438 in 9627944
But in the end, we’re still using index 0 when calculating the offset:
llvm-project/clang/lib/CIR/CodeGen/CIRGenExpr.cpp
Lines 59 to 62 in 9627944
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed it to use
field->getFieldIndex(), similar to howCIRGenFunction::emitAddrOfFieldStoragedoes.