-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15k
[MLIR][Python] Add docstring for generated python op classes #158198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61fa5c2
[MLIR][Python] Add docstring for generated python op classes
PragmaTwice 0e199e4
Add a tblgen test case
PragmaTwice 7795d9e
refine the test case
PragmaTwice 1cc3d14
fix replace
PragmaTwice 6cf67d3
Update mlir/tools/mlir-tblgen/OpPythonBindingGen.cpp
PragmaTwice 25d1ae2
fix test case
PragmaTwice 82e6141
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into mlir-python-docstring
PragmaTwice 8b304c2
fix regex
PragmaTwice File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems the line numbers are changed frequently as the tblgen code changed, which may introduce code conflicts. Maybe we can make it a regex like
{{ \d+ }}? cc @maksleventalUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i mean yes but then that defeats the purpose of verifying that the line numbers are correct?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually yea sure why not - for the line numbers in generated code we can do
{{ \d+ }}(ain't no one gonna check those anyway lol).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm yeah you are right. Although practically we may just generate and then paste the line number here. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the generated line number it's fine to ignore - the line numbers that reference the test source file itself are good enough.