Is zip-code-tabulation-area data available for 2021?

[zzaacchh]

I've noticed that the folders for 2021 are populated, except for https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/tree/master/GeoJSON/500k/2021/zip-code-tabulation-area.json. I'm curious whether this is expected?

Thanks for making this repository available. It is a great and valuable resource!

[loganpowell]

Please elaborate on the issue. The folder you specified exists and is populated.

…

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, 7:36 PM Zach Buckner ***@***.***> wrote: I've noticed that the folders for 2021 are populated, except for https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/tree/master/GeoJSON/500k/2021 I'm curious whether this is expected? Thanks for making this repository available. It is a great and valuable resource! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#36>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2ACP2ZZIE57ME66OCJEEDXZ6OBFANCNFSM6AAAAAA4UBLZJI> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zzaacchh]

Thanks for your quick response, @loganpowell . I edited my previous message to include zip-code-tabulation-area.json to the end of that path. For instance, 2020 has one of these files: https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/blob/master/GeoJSON/500k/2020/zip-code-tabulation-area.json . As does 2019: https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/blob/master/GeoJSON/500k/2019/zip-code-tabulation-area.json

[loganpowell]

Ah, yeah, 2021 zctas are the same as 2020

…

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, 8:51 PM Zach Buckner ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for your quick response, @loganpowell <https://github.com/loganpowell> . I edited my previous message to include zip-code-tabulation-area.json to the end of that path. For instance, 2020 has one of these files: https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/blob/master/GeoJSON/500k/2020/zip-code-tabulation-area.json . As does 2019: https://github.com/loganpowell/census-geojson/blob/master/GeoJSON/500k/2019/zip-code-tabulation-area.json — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#36 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2ACPZPKDNBSFGKZCQ5GD3XZ6WZXANCNFSM6AAAAAA4UBLZJI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zzaacchh]

Ahh -- that makes sense. I'm not sure of your organizational scheme -- would it be problematic to load a copy of that 2020 data in the 2021 directory? Or a symlink? That would allow folks who use this data programmatically from not having to treat holes in the data as special/edge cases?

[loganpowell]

We're having to treat it as a special edge case in CitySDK. If you have a proposal for symlinking, I'm open to it

…

On Mon, Sep 11, 2023, 8:58 PM Zach Buckner ***@***.***> wrote: Ahh -- that makes sense. I'm not sure of your organizational scheme -- would it be problematic to load a copy of that 2020 data in the 2021 directory? Or a symlink? That would allow folks who use this data programmatically from not having to treat holes in the data as special/edge cases? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#36 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2ACP57I7Q4O5SWX7X4VKTXZ6XURANCNFSM6AAAAAA4UBLZJI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>