-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
Open
Labels
Description
Steps to reproduce
- Create a model that has an object column, mapped as a JSON type in PostgreSQL
- Try to do a
findsearching for a full value in that property/column, e.g.const objectValue = {a: 1, b: 2};and thenrepo.find({where: {objectProperty: objectValue}})orrepo.find({where: {objectProperty: {eq: objectValue}}})
Current Behavior
- The
{objectProperty: {eq: value}}is translated down into{objectProperty: value} - This line assumes that, if the value is an object, it must contain exactly one field that must be an operator: https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-connector-postgresql/blob/master/lib/postgresql.js#L654
- It tries to map e.g.
aas an operator name - The
buildExpressionoperator switch hits itsdefaultclause which delegates to the base class inloopback-connector: https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-connector-postgresql/blob/master/lib/postgresql.js#L540-L543 - That base class method has a
switchwith nodefaultclause, so it doesn't throw any errors and just concatenates the column name with the placeholder for the value: https://github.com/strongloop/loopback-connector/blob/master/lib/sql.js#L969 - And so it generates invalid SQL that looks like
"columName"$1
Expected Behavior
- I should be able to use object values in where clauses if the property contains object values
Link to reproduction sandbox
WIP -- NB: encountering this in an LB4 app
Additional information
- Running on
linux x64 12.22.1 npm lsdoesn't work withrush, but usingloopback-connector-postgresqlv5.0.1, withloopback-connectorv4.11.1, and the following LB4 components:"@loopback/boot": "2.2.0""@loopback/context": "3.9.3""@loopback/core": "2.5.0""@loopback/metadata": "2.2.6""@loopback/openapi-v3": "3.3.1""@loopback/openapi-v3-types": "1.2.1""@loopback/repository": "2.4.0""@loopback/rest": "4.0.0""@loopback/rest-explorer": "2.2.0"
Related Issues
Haven't found any yet
Workaround
Create a custom class to represent the value, and then have the equality comparison value use that, e.g. something like this, but without the prototype pollution vulnerabilities:
class JSONWrapper {
[k: string]: any
constructor(value: any) {
Object.assign(this, value)
}
}
// elsewhere:
repo.find({where: {objectProperty: new JSONWrapper(objectValue)}});This causes the expression.constructor === Object check to fail, and so it doesn't try to unwrap the value