Skip to content

Commit 1cf44ea

Browse files
committed
Gemini Edit
1 parent c5e7201 commit 1cf44ea

File tree

1 file changed

+47
-49
lines changed

1 file changed

+47
-49
lines changed

content/posts/2025-01-04-nas.md

Lines changed: 47 additions & 49 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5,73 +5,71 @@ tags: [photography, nas, jococruise]
55
categories: [Photography]
66
slug: considering-a-nas
77
---
8-
9-
I'm thinking of building a [NAS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network-attached_storage).
8+
I'm considering building a NAS (Network Attached Storage), primarily for photo
9+
backup.
1010

1111
<!--more-->
1212

13-
Primarily for photo backup purposes.
14-
15-
Over the last few years, I got into photography, but ultimately I've been
16-
stalled in improving.
13+
Over the last few years, I've gotten into photography, but I've been stalled in
14+
my progress.
1715

18-
The root issue, is while I like taking pictures, composing, framing them, I don't seem
19-
to enjoy editing them as much.
16+
The root issue is that while I enjoy taking picturescomposing and framing
17+
them – I don't enjoy editing them nearly as much.
2018

21-
It's ultimately a problem of organization. I don't have space.
19+
It's ultimately a problem of organization; I simply don't have enough storage
20+
space.
2221

23-
Once I get going on culling them, it's not so bad, but I'm not quick about it.
24-
So the problem recurs.
22+
Once I get going on culling my photos, it's not so bad, but I'm not quick about
23+
it. So the problem recurs.
2524

26-
In effect, I need to be more ruthless in that regard, in getting the pictures
27-
off of the SD cards and onto one of my computers' harddrives. But ultimately, I
28-
don't delete the bad photos quickly enough, which makes them accumulate on the
29-
active hard drives.
25+
Effectively, I need to be more ruthless in getting the pictures off the SD cards
26+
and onto one of my computers' hard drives. But I don't delete the bad photos
27+
quickly enough, which causes them to accumulate on the active hard drives.
3028

31-
This sort of came to a head on the 2024 JoCoCruise. I once again too too many
32-
photos, and then they fill up the harddrive, which means I can't take pictures
33-
off the cards anymore.
29+
This issue came to a head on the 2024 JoCoCruise. I once again took far too many
30+
photos, and they filled up my hard drive, which meant I couldn't transfer any
31+
more pictures from the SD cards.
3432

35-
And then I become concerned with not losing pictures, both those I've culled and
36-
edited, and those I haven't looked at yet.
33+
I then became concerned about losing pictures, both those I'd culled and edited,
34+
and those I hadn't looked at yet.
3735

38-
Then I ultimately lose track of what I've processed and not.
36+
Eventually, I lost track of what I had processed and what I hadn't.
3937

40-
So I need a better way.
38+
So, I need a better system.
4139

42-
But I can't do that without space.
40+
But I can't implement that without more storage space.
4341

44-
Hence, a NAS.
42+
Hence, the NAS.
4543

46-
I could get an off the shelf unit, but I didn't love the price profiles for them
47-
despite the advanced organization features they provide. I've never been amazing
48-
at adhering to someone else's organizational principals, and it requires a bunch
49-
of additional research to get going.
44+
I could buy an off-the-shelf unit, but I wasn't thrilled with their price
45+
points, despite the advanced organization features they offer. I've never been
46+
great at adhering to someone else's organizational principles, and it would
47+
require a bunch of additional research to get started.
5048

51-
So I'm building one myself, and probably throwing TrueNAS or HexOS onto it.
49+
So, I'm building one myself and will likely install TrueNAS or HexOS.
5250

53-
I just want something that can expand if I need to, and not have to work on
54-
the cloud primarily. Ultimately, anything truly worth keeping would also be
55-
archived in the cloud, but I hope to keep that set of data to be minimal.
51+
I just want something that I can expand if needed, without having to rely
52+
primarily on the cloud. Ultimately, anything truly worth keeping will also be
53+
archived in the cloud, but I hope to keep that dataset minimal.
5654

57-
I'd be more tempted to buy something pre-made but I've heard tales that they
58-
don't put good CPUs in there, and I have a 3700X just laying around since I
59-
upgraded my gaming PC.
55+
I'd be more tempted to buy something pre-made, but I've heard that they often
56+
don't include powerful CPUs. I happen to have a 3700X just lying around since
57+
I upgraded my gaming PC.
6058

61-
Overall, I'm looking at some refurbished 20TB drives, and the
62-
[JONSBO N4](https://www.jonsbo.com/en/products/N4Black.html) as a case.
63-
That'll plenty of space for additional drives upgrades, but still compact.
64-
It won't be too tough a build, since without a GPU, the power and
65-
airflow needs should be minimal. I'll need a different low profile CPU cooler,
66-
but everything is dwarfed by the drive costs anyway so that's fine.
59+
Overall, I'm looking at some refurbished 20TB drives and the JONSBO N4 case.
60+
That will provide plenty of space for additional drive upgrades while still
61+
being compact. It shouldn't be too tough a build; without a GPU, the power and
62+
airflow needs should be minimal. I'll need a different low-profile CPU cooler,
63+
but everything else is dwarfed by the drive costs anyway, so that's fine.
6764

68-
I'm looking at using a double parity set up for the drives, and with 4 drives,
69-
that'll mostly be swallowed by overhead. But each additional drive should let
70-
me get nearly the full capacity. I don't anticipate needing it that soon at
71-
least.
65+
I'm planning to use a double-parity setup for the drives. With four drives,
66+
much of the capacity will be used for overhead, but each additional drive should
67+
provide nearly its full capacity. I don't anticipate needing that anytime soon,
68+
at least.
7269

73-
But with ~120MB for each raw + Fine JPGs, it'll take a long age for me to hit
74-
that capacity, so I'm feeling pretty safe with rebuild risks.
70+
Considering each RAW + Fine JPG pair takes up around 120MB, it will take me a
71+
long time to reach that capacity, so I'm feeling pretty confident about having
72+
minimal rebuild risks.
7573

76-
And with that, I should be able to unblock myself from clearing out my existing
77-
cards, and set up a proper workflow to process my dang photos.
74+
With this setup, I should be able to unblock myself from clearing out my
75+
existing SD cards and establish a proper workflow to finally process my photos.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)