-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Labels
agi-foundationCore components for AGI-level autonomyCore components for AGI-level autonomyenhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request
Description
Purpose
Enable NeoKai to accumulate expertise across sessions, learning from each interaction and building a persistent knowledge base that improves future performance. This is essential for AGI-level autonomy because:
- Compound learning: Each session makes NeoKai more capable
- Project expertise: Deep knowledge of specific codebases
- Skill acquisition: Learning new capabilities from experience
- Best practices: Capturing and applying learned patterns
Without cross-session learning, NeoKai starts fresh each time and cannot develop expertise.
Current State
NeoKai has:
- Per-room memory storage
- No systematic knowledge extraction
- No cross-project learning
- No skill acquisition mechanism
Each session operates largely independently, with limited carryover of learned knowledge.
Proposed Approach
Phase 1: Knowledge Base Architecture
-
Knowledge Layers
interface KnowledgeBase { // Global knowledge (all projects) global: GlobalKnowledge; // Project-specific knowledge projects: Map<ProjectId, ProjectKnowledge>; // User preferences userPreferences: UserPreferences; // Skills and capabilities skills: SkillRegistry; } interface GlobalKnowledge { patterns: Pattern[]; antiPatterns: AntiPattern[]; bestPractices: BestPractice[]; toolUsage: ToolUsageKnowledge[]; domainKnowledge: DomainKnowledge[]; } interface ProjectKnowledge { architecture: ArchitectureUnderstanding; conventions: CodeConvention[]; dependencies: DependencyKnowledge[]; hotspots: CodeHotspot[]; // Areas with frequent changes gotchas: ProjectGotcha[]; testingPatterns: TestingPattern[]; }
-
Knowledge Storage
interface KnowledgeEntry { id: string; type: KnowledgeType; content: string; // Provenance source: 'extracted' | 'user_provided' | 'inferred'; sessionOrigin?: SessionId; projectOrigin?: ProjectId; // Metadata confidence: number; applicability: string[]; // Tags for when this applies lastVerified: Date; usageCount: number; // Relationships relatedEntries: string[]; supersedes?: string[]; // If this replaces older entries }
Phase 2: Knowledge Extraction Pipeline
-
Session Analysis
interface KnowledgeExtractor { // Analyze completed session analyzeSession(session: SessionLog): Promise<ExtractedKnowledge>; // Identify patterns worth remembering identifyPatterns(session: SessionLog): Promise<Pattern[]>; // Extract best practices extractBestPractices(session: SessionLog): Promise<BestPractice[]>; // Identify anti-patterns identifyAntiPatterns(session: SessionLog): Promise<AntiPattern[]>; }
-
Extraction Triggers
const extractionTriggers = { // Successful patterns taskSuccess: { extract: ['approach', 'techniques', 'tools_used'], confidence: 0.8 }, // Failed patterns (anti-patterns) taskFailure: { extract: ['what_failed', 'why_failed', 'what_worked_instead'], confidence: 0.7 }, // User corrections userCorrection: { extract: ['correction', 'reason'], confidence: 0.95 }, // Novel discoveries newInsight: { extract: ['insight', 'context'], confidence: 0.6 } };
-
LLM-Assisted Extraction
const extractionPrompt = ` Analyze this session and extract knowledge worth remembering: Session summary: {summary} Key actions taken: {actions} Outcomes: {outcomes} Extract: 1. Patterns that worked well (could be reused) 2. Patterns that didn't work (should be avoided) 3. Project-specific conventions discovered 4. General insights applicable to other sessions For each, provide: - The knowledge content - When it applies (context tags) - Confidence level (how certain) - Why it's worth remembering `;
Phase 3: Knowledge Application
-
Context Injection
interface KnowledgeInjector { // Inject relevant knowledge into prompts injectKnowledge( prompt: string, context: SessionContext ): Promise<EnrichedPrompt>; // Find applicable knowledge findApplicableKnowledge( context: SessionContext ): Promise<KnowledgeEntry[]>; }
-
Prompt Enhancement
// Example enhanced prompt: const enhancedPrompt = ` ${basePrompt} ## Relevant Project Knowledge - This project uses tab indentation (detected from 47 files) - The auth module requires special handling (learned from session #123) - Tests must be run before commits (user preference from session #89) ## Known Gotchas - The database migration script occasionally fails; retry works - E2E tests are flaky on the login flow; check for race conditions ## Applicable Best Practices - When modifying shared types, update all consumers - Run 'bun run check' after any significant changes `;
-
Knowledge Retrieval
interface KnowledgeRetrieval { // Semantic search across knowledge base semanticSearch(query: string): Promise<KnowledgeEntry[]>; // Get knowledge by context tags getByTags(tags: string[]): Promise<KnowledgeEntry[]>; // Get most relevant knowledge for current context getRelevant(context: SessionContext): Promise<KnowledgeEntry[]>; }
Phase 4: Skill Acquisition System
-
Skill Definition
interface Skill { id: string; name: string; description: string; // When this skill is applicable triggers: SkillTrigger[]; // How to execute this skill procedure: SkillStep[]; // Prerequisites prerequisites: string[]; // Proficiency tracking proficiency: number; // 0-100 successfulApplications: number; failedApplications: number; }
-
Skill Learning
interface SkillLearner { // Learn skill from successful execution learnFromSuccess( task: Task, execution: ExecutionTrace ): Promise<Skill>; // Improve existing skill improveSkill( skill: Skill, execution: ExecutionTrace ): Promise<Skill>; // Identify skill gaps identifyGaps(): Promise<string[]>; }
-
Skill Application
interface SkillApplicator { // Check if any skills apply to current task findApplicableSkills(task: Task): Promise<Skill[]>; // Execute skill procedure executeSkill(skill: Skill, context: Context): Promise<Result>; }
Phase 5: Knowledge Maintenance
-
Knowledge Lifecycle
interface KnowledgeLifecycle { // Verify knowledge is still accurate verify(entry: KnowledgeEntry): Promise<boolean>; // Update outdated knowledge update(entry: KnowledgeEntry): Promise<KnowledgeEntry>; // Archive deprecated knowledge archive(entry: KnowledgeEntry): Promise<void>; // Merge duplicate knowledge deduplicate(): Promise<void>; }
-
Conflict Resolution
interface ConflictResolver { // Detect conflicting knowledge detectConflicts(): Promise<KnowledgeConflict[]>; // Resolve conflicts resolve(conflict: KnowledgeConflict): Promise<Resolution>; }
Technical Considerations
Storage Architecture
- Centralized vs distributed knowledge storage
- Indexing for efficient retrieval
- Handling large knowledge bases
Knowledge Quality
- Preventing accumulation of low-quality knowledge
- Handling contradictory knowledge
- Measuring knowledge utility
Privacy & Security
- What knowledge should be shared vs private
- Handling sensitive information
- User control over knowledge accumulation
Performance
- Retrieval speed for large knowledge bases
- Incremental updates vs full rebuilds
- Caching strategies
Success Metrics
- Knowledge Utilization: % of sessions that use accumulated knowledge
- Learning Velocity: Rate of knowledge accumulation over time
- Quality Improvement: Correlation between knowledge usage and success rate
- Skill Proficiency: Improvement in skill success rates over time
Implementation Roadmap
- Phase 1: Basic knowledge storage and retrieval
- Phase 2: Session analysis and extraction
- Phase 3: Context injection and application
- Phase 4: Skill acquisition system
- Phase 5: Knowledge maintenance lifecycle
Questions for Discussion
- Should knowledge be shared across all users or per-user?
- How to handle knowledge that becomes outdated?
- What's the right granularity for knowledge entries?
- Should users be able to manually add/edit knowledge?
Part of the AGI-Level Autonomy initiative
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
agi-foundationCore components for AGI-level autonomyCore components for AGI-level autonomyenhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request