fix some typos

Author: yuxqiu

book/src/development/macro_expansions.md

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ let x: Option<u32> = Some(42);
 m!(x, x.unwrap());
 ```
 
-If the `m!(x, x.unwrapp());` line is expanded, we would get two expanded
+If the `m!(x, x.unwrap());` line is expanded, we would get two expanded
 expressions:
 
 - `x.is_some()` (from the `$a.is_some()` line in the `m` macro)

clippy_lints/src/methods/mod.rs

@@ -3786,7 +3786,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     /// This pattern is often followed by manual unwrapping of the `Option`. The simplification
-    /// results in more readable and succint code without the need for manual unwrapping.
+    /// results in more readable and succinct code without the need for manual unwrapping.
     ///
     /// ### Example
     /// ```no_run
@@ -3812,7 +3812,7 @@ declare_clippy_lint! {
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     /// This pattern is often followed by manual unwrapping of `Result`. The simplification
-    /// results in more readable and succint code without the need for manual unwrapping.
+    /// results in more readable and succinct code without the need for manual unwrapping.
     ///
     /// ### Example
     /// ```no_run

clippy_lints/src/missing_asserts_for_indexing.rs

@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ fn report_indexes(cx: &LateContext<'_>, map: &UnhashMap<u64, Vec<IndexEntry<'_>>
                     slice,
                 } if indexes.len() > 1 => {
                     // if we have found an `assert!`, let's also check that it's actually right
-                    // and if it convers the highest index and if not, suggest the correct length
+                    // and if it covers the highest index and if not, suggest the correct length
                     let sugg = match comparison {
                         // `v.len() < 5` and `v.len() <= 5` does nothing in terms of bounds checks.
                         // The user probably meant `v.len() > 5`

clippy_lints/src/no_effect.rs

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ fn check_no_effect(cx: &LateContext<'_>, stmt: &Stmt<'_>) -> bool {
 }
 
 fn is_operator_overridden(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
-    // It's very hard or impossable to check whether overridden operator have side-effect this lint.
+    // It's very hard or impossible to check whether overridden operator have side-effect this lint.
     // So, this function assume user-defined operator is overridden with an side-effect.
     // The definition of user-defined structure here is ADT-type,
     // Althrough this will weaken the ability of this lint, less error lint-fix happen.

clippy_lints/src/serde_api.rs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ use rustc_session::declare_lint_pass;
 
 declare_clippy_lint! {
     /// ### What it does
-    /// Checks for mis-uses of the serde API.
+    /// Checks for misuses of the serde API.
     ///
     /// ### Why is this bad?
     /// Serde is very finnicky about how its API should be

clippy_lints/src/wildcard_imports.rs

@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ impl LateLintPass<'_> for WildcardImports {
             } else {
                 // In this case, the `use_path.span` ends right before the `::*`, so we need to
                 // extend it up to the `*`. Since it is hard to find the `*` in weird
-                // formattings like `use _ ::  *;`, we extend it up to, but not including the
+                // formatting like `use _ ::  *;`, we extend it up to, but not including the
                 // `;`. In nested imports, like `use _::{inner::*, _}` there is no `;` and we
                 // can just use the end of the item span
                 let mut span = use_path.span.with_hi(item.span.hi());

clippy_utils/src/ty/type_certainty/mod.rs

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ fn expr_type_certainty(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> Certainty {
 
         ExprKind::Call(callee, args) => {
             let lhs = expr_type_certainty(cx, callee);
-            let rhs = if type_is_inferrable_from_arguments(cx, expr) {
+            let rhs = if type_is_inferable_from_arguments(cx, expr) {
                 meet(args.iter().map(|arg| expr_type_certainty(cx, arg)))
             } else {
                 Certainty::Uncertain
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ fn expr_type_certainty(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> Certainty {
                 receiver_type_certainty = receiver_type_certainty.with_def_id(self_ty_def_id);
             };
             let lhs = path_segment_certainty(cx, receiver_type_certainty, method, false);
-            let rhs = if type_is_inferrable_from_arguments(cx, expr) {
+            let rhs = if type_is_inferable_from_arguments(cx, expr) {
                 meet(
                     std::iter::once(receiver_type_certainty).chain(args.iter().map(|arg| expr_type_certainty(cx, arg))),
                 )
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ fn update_res(cx: &LateContext<'_>, parent_certainty: Certainty, path_segment: &
 }
 
 #[allow(clippy::cast_possible_truncation)]
-fn type_is_inferrable_from_arguments(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
+fn type_is_inferable_from_arguments(cx: &LateContext<'_>, expr: &Expr<'_>) -> bool {
     let Some(callee_def_id) = (match expr.kind {
         ExprKind::Call(callee, _) => {
             let callee_ty = cx.typeck_results().expr_ty(callee);

tests/ui/as_conversions.rs

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ fn main() {
 with_span!(
     span
 
-    fn coverting() {
+    fn converting() {
         let x = 0u32 as u64;
     }
 );

tests/ui/default_numeric_fallback_i32.fixed

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ fn check_expect_suppression() {
     let x = 21;
 }
 
-mod type_already_infered {
+mod type_already_inferred {
     // Should NOT lint if bound to return type
     fn ret_i32() -> i32 {
         1

tests/ui/default_numeric_fallback_i32.rs

@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ fn check_expect_suppression() {
     let x = 21;
 }
 
-mod type_already_infered {
+mod type_already_inferred {
     // Should NOT lint if bound to return type
     fn ret_i32() -> i32 {
         1