You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
title: "pyOpenSci Makes Python Software Better and Easier to Find Through Peer Review"
5
5
header:
6
6
overlay_image: images/header.png
7
7
overlay_filter: 0.8
8
8
intro:
9
-
- excerpt: "Our open peer review process facilitates scientists getting credit and recognition for the work they've invested in developing scientific Python tools. The peer review process also supports scientists in finding vetted and maintained software, which drives their open science workflows."
9
+
- excerpt: "Our open peer review process makes scientific software better and easier to discover. [Check out our accepted packages.](https://www.pyopensci.org/python-packages.html)"
alt: "A pencil sketch of a round table with people sitting around it from different backgrounds working on laptops and also writing together."
21
21
excerpt: "The pyOpenSci peer review process multiplies shared knowledge, making it easier for Pythonistas of all levels to accomplish challenging tasks, such as navigating the Python packaging ecosystem, with relative ease. And our diverse community supports scientific package maintainers in their efforts to develop and build robust software."
22
-
title: "pyOS software peer review benefits open source maintainers"
22
+
title: "Peer review benefits open source maintainers"
btn_label: Learn more about the benefits of peer review
25
25
btn_class: btn--primary
@@ -29,14 +29,14 @@ peer_review:
29
29
excerpt: "Software peer review, similar to the review of scientific papers, is a process where scientists vet software code, documentation and infrastructure. pyOpenSci leads an [open peer review process](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/our-process/how-review-works.html) run by a community of dedicated volunteers. Reviews are supportive and fully transparent with the shared goal of improving the quality, usability and maintainability of the software that is driving open science.
30
30
31
31
* Diverse teams lead each review, enhancing the overall feedback quality."
32
-
title: "About peer review of scientific Python software"
alt: "A pencil sketch of a round table with people sitting around it from different backgrounds working on laptops and also writing together."
38
38
excerpt: "Our partnership with JOSS means that you don't have to choose between pyOpenSci and JOSS. Simply submit your package to pyOS for review. If your package is accepted and in scope for JOSS, it will be fast-tracked through JOSS' review process. "
39
-
title: "Get published with JOSS through a pyOpenSci review"
alt: "A pencil sketch of a round table with people from different backgrounds sitting around it, working on laptops and also writing together."
15
-
excerpt: "We run an open peer review process for scientific Python software. Peer review helps maintainers improve the quality, usability and long-term maintainability of scientific software."
16
-
title: Raising the bar for scientific Python software"
15
+
excerpt: "We run an open peer review process for Python software. Peer review helps maintainers improve the quality, usability and long-term maintainability of scientific software."
alt: "A black and grey sketch of a group of people sitting at a desk in front of a monitor smiling."
23
-
title: "Get Involved: Help us improve our scientific Python packaging resources"
23
+
title: "Get Involved: Help us improve our Python packaging resources"
24
24
excerpt: "
25
25
We need your help! Our packaging content is community-created and reviewed through an open review process on GitHub. The more feedback that we get, the more useful our resources are to the community. Get involved by:
26
26
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ toc: false
64
64
{% include feature_row id="community-created" type="right" %}
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _pages/partners.md
+18-18Lines changed: 18 additions & 18 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ scientists:
14
14
excerpt: "Our catalog of vetted open source tools makes it easier for scientists to find the trusted tools that they need to develop their open science workflows."
15
15
title: "Help scientists find the open science tools that they need"
btn_label: View our growing list of accepted scientific Python packages
17
+
btn_label: Explore our accepted Python packages
18
18
btn_class: btn--primary
19
19
mission:
20
20
- excerpt: "Domain-specific communities can partner with PyOpenSci to leverage both our peer review process and development of Python packaging packaging guidelines."
excerpt: "Your community can take advantage of our existing, developed and well-documented peer review process which includes:
52
-
53
-
* **A diverse and growing team of editors.** We ask partner communities to have at least 2 members of their community on our editorial team. We want our partner community to make the final decision on whether a package should receive the label of being affiliated. Typically an editor will run 2-4 reviews a year. [Learn more about the editor role.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/editors-guide.html)
54
-
55
-
* **A suite of community reviewers whose expertise spans numerous scientific domains.** We ask that partner communities help us find reviews in their specific domain areas as packages come in for review. [Learn more about the requirements for reviewers.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/reviewer-guide.html)
56
-
57
-
* **Community driven packaging resources and guidelines:** Our packaging guidelines drive the peer review process. Instead of communities creating their own individual guidelines, pyOpenSci partners collaborate with us to expand packaging resources."
alt: "diagram with a set of 3 boxes with arrows pointing to the right. The first box says submit your package with a code icon above it. The second says Review with pyOpensci Standards below. Blow the second box is a dark purple box that says Your community standards in it. And an arrow pointing to that box that says customized review. The third box says Accepted pyos + community affiliated."
@@ -126,7 +114,20 @@ We will:
126
114
<divclass="pyos-section"markdown="1">
127
115
<divclass="content"markdown="1">
128
116
129
-
{% include feature_row id="leverage" type="right" %}
117
+
<!-- {% include feature_row id="leverage" type="right" %} -->
118
+
119
+
## Leverage our peer review process
120
+
121
+
Your science domain-specific community can take advantage of our existing, developed and well-documented peer review process which includes:
122
+
123
+
***A growing team of editors from a diverse set of scientific and technical backgrounds.** We ask partner communities to have at least 2 members of their community on our editorial team. We want our partner community to make the final decision on whether a package should receive the label of being affiliated. Typically an editor will run 2-4 reviews a year. [Learn more about the editor role.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/editors-guide.html)
124
+
125
+
***Community reviewers whose expertise spans numerous scientific domains.** We ask that partner communities help us find reviews in their specific domain areas as packages come in for review. [Learn more about the requirements for reviewers.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/reviewer-guide.html)
126
+
127
+
***Community driven packaging resources and guidelines:** Our packaging guidelines drive the peer review process. Instead of communities creating their own individual guidelines, pyOpenSci partners collaborate with us to expand packaging resources."
128
+
129
+
[Learn more about our partnerships](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/partners/scientific-communities.html){: .btn .btn--primary }
130
+
130
131
131
132
</div>
132
133
</div>
@@ -151,7 +152,8 @@ We will:
151
152
152
153
<divclass="pyos-section"markdown="1">
153
154
<divclass="content"markdown="1">
154
-
## Raising the bar for Scientific Python software
155
+
156
+
## Raising the bar for scientists developing Python software
155
157
156
158
More packages going through our review process means
157
159
we're all working together to raise the bar in terms of
@@ -164,7 +166,7 @@ By reviewing packages from the entire ecosystem, pyOpenSci can identify redundan
164
166
165
167
<divclass="pyos-section purple"markdown="1">
166
168
<divclass="content"markdown="1">
167
-
## Why do so many scientific Python communities exist?
169
+
## Why do so many domain specific Python communities exist?
168
170
169
171
Within the Python ecosystem, various science-domain-specific communities are creating peer review processes to evaluate community-affiliated tools.
170
172
@@ -180,5 +182,3 @@ pyOpenSci was created to target these exact issues in support of open science.
## Explore our accepted open source Python packages
23
24
24
-
## Explore our accepted scientific Python open source packages
25
+
To date, {{ total_packages }} packages have been accepted by pyOpenSci through our [open peer review process](https://www.pyopensci.org/about-peer-review/index.html). You can [check out the packages that are currently under review in our GitHub submission repository.](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues)
25
26
26
-
To date, {{ total_packages }} packages have been accepted into the pyOpenSci
27
-
ecosystem. [Click here to check out packages that are currently under review.](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-submission/issues)
27
+
[Click here to learn more about the process for submitting a package to pyOpenSci.](https://www.pyopensci.org/software-peer-review/how-to/author-guide.html){: .btn .btn--success }
28
28
29
29
### Community Partners
30
30
31
31
To view packages affiliated with our partner communities that are a part of ourpeer review partnership program, click on a community link below. [Learn more about our community partnerships here.](/partners.html)
0 commit comments