CONTENT: fix guide links throughout

Author: lwasser

_pages/python-packages.md

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ classes: wide
             <p>You're in the right place! Learn about the steps to submit a package
             for open peer review in our guidebook. </p>
           </div>  
-          <p><a href="https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/open-source-software-submissions/author-guide.html" class="btn btn--inverse"><i class="fas fa-angle-right"></i> View our Author Guide </a></p>
+          <p><a href="https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/software-peer-review-guide/author-guide.html" class="btn btn--inverse"><i class="fas fa-angle-right"></i> View our Author Guide </a></p>
       </div>
     </div>
   </div>

_posts/2019-11-18-pandera-dataframe-validation.md

@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ categories:
   - data-validation
   - dataframes
   - highlight
+comments: true
 ---
 
 Modern data engineering and analysis workflows will often involve using data

_posts/2020-04-29-movingpandas-movement-data-analysis.md

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ categories:
   - blog-post
   - pandas
   - spatial
+comments: true
 ---
 
 Movement data is everywhere: from tracking apps that record human or vehicle movement to ecologists monitoring wildlife behavior. Movement data analysis is challenging since movement data combines time series and spatial data analyses questions. Existing spatial analysis libraries, such as GeoPandas, are great at handling spatial data but they don't support moving objects. 

_posts/2022-09-10-executive-director-pyopensci-leah-wasser-updates.md

@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ There are a few ways to get involved with us now.
 1. [You can sign up to be a reviewer by filling out our reviewer form](https://forms.gle/B6zAukLCvJot5nws6). If you do this, we will reach out to you if a package is submitted that suits your background and interests!
   * We will also be growing our editorial board in the upcoming months. Once you have reviewed for us you are eligible to be considered as an editor. We will be posting more about this process in the upcoming months.
 1. Our open peer review process is running! If you have a package that you are working on, [you can submit it to our peer review process](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-review/issues). 
-  * You can learn more about our review process here in our [community guide (which will be updated in the upcoming months so that it is more clear)](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/open-source-software-peer-review/aims-and-scope.html).
+  * You can learn more about our review process here in our [community guide (which will be updated in the upcoming months so that it is more clear)](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/about-peer-review/aims-and-scope.html).
   * If you have a package that you wish to submit but need some guidance, you can also submit a presubmission inquiry or a request for help here.
 2. You can [follow us on twitter](https://www.twitter.com/pyopensci) to keep tabs on our progress. 
 

_posts/2022-09-27-call-for-python-software-review-editors.md

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ categories:
   - blog-post
   - highlight
   - peer-review
+comments: true
 ---
 
 ## An update on pyOpenSci's review process 
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ With that below you will find a few updates.
 
 [David Nicholson](https://github.com/NickleDave), who has been working with pyOpenSci for the past few years as 
 an editor will take on the Editor in Chief role! [You can learn more about that 
-role here](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/open-source-software-submissions/editor-in-chief-guide.html) in our peer review guide. This position will rotate once we have our editorial board setup.
+role here](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/software-peer-review-guide/editor-in-chief-guide.html) in our peer review guide. This position will rotate once we have our editorial board setup.
 
 As Editor in Chief, David will:
 
@@ -57,7 +58,7 @@ longer given mutual consent. You will be responsible for handling 3-4 package
 reviews during that year. We may also bring on guest editors in other 
 instances, e.g., because of their familiarity with a specific domain.
 
-You can read more about the [roles and responsibilities of and editor here](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/open-source-software-submissions/editors-guide.html). 
+You can read more about the [roles and responsibilities of and editor here](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/software-peer-review-guide/editors-guide.html). 
 
 We currently have a package in the queue that is spatial / remote sensing related
 that we'd love to have an editor onboard to review. But we are in need of editors

_posts/2022-10-24-why-should-python-open-source-matter-science.md

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ categories:
   - python-packaging
   - peer-review
 toc: false
+comments: true
 ---
 
 ## Why Python open source package health should matter to you as a scientist 
@@ -192,7 +193,7 @@ So how do we track open source tool health (for science)?
 
 ### Peer review is actually the second step in our process. 
 
-We won't begin to review a package [without bare minimum checks](https://www.pyopensci.org/contributing-guide/open-source-software-submissions/author-guide.html#pyopensci-review-guide-for-python-open-source-package-authors).
+We won't begin to review a package [without bare minimum checks](https://www.pyopensci.org/peer-review-guide/software-peer-review-guide/author-guide.html#does-your-package-meet-packaging-requirements).
 We hope that these bare minimal checks help maintainers as they try to decide
 what is good enough infrastructure for their package.