|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: Tomcat and Jetty Comparison |
| 3 | +lang: en |
| 4 | +layout: post |
| 5 | +audio: false |
| 6 | +translated: false |
| 7 | +generated: true |
| 8 | +image: false |
| 9 | +--- |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Tomcat and Jetty are both popular **Java-based web servers and servlet containers**, but they serve slightly different purposes and have different strengths. Here’s a breakdown in a narrative style for easier reading: |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +--- |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +### Tomcat |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +Tomcat, developed by the Apache Software Foundation, is often considered the **default choice** when people think of running Java web applications. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +* **Focus**: It’s primarily designed as a reference implementation of the Java Servlet and JSP specifications. |
| 20 | +* **Ecosystem Fit**: Many frameworks (like Spring MVC) assume Tomcat as the default container, so integration and documentation are abundant. |
| 21 | +* **Performance**: Reliable and stable under high traffic, but it carries more overhead than Jetty for lightweight setups. |
| 22 | +* **Use Cases**: Large-scale enterprise apps, production systems where standard servlet/JSP support is required. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +--- |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +### Jetty |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +Jetty, developed by Eclipse Foundation, is lightweight and highly embeddable. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +* **Focus**: It’s designed to be a small, fast HTTP server and servlet container that can be embedded into other applications. |
| 31 | +* **Ecosystem Fit**: Frequently used in microservices, frameworks, and servers that need to ship with their own HTTP engine (e.g., Hadoop, Spark, Solr, and many Spring Boot apps embed Jetty). |
| 32 | +* **Performance**: Very fast to start, lower memory footprint, and well-suited for scenarios with many short-lived connections (like WebSockets). |
| 33 | +* **Use Cases**: Microservices, IoT, tools needing an integrated web server, or environments with resource constraints. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +--- |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +### Key Differences in Spirit |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +* **Tomcat** feels like a “full-featured, ready-to-deploy” server. It shines when you want a standalone application server with a well-known ecosystem. |
| 40 | +* **Jetty** feels like a “component” rather than a “product.” It excels when you want to embed HTTP serving inside your application or keep the footprint minimal. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +--- |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +👉 If you’re building an **enterprise web application**, Tomcat is usually the go-to. |
| 45 | +👉 If you’re building **lightweight services or tools** where the server is just a piece of the puzzle, Jetty tends to be a better fit. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +--- |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +Would you like me to also cover **how they compare in Spring Boot** specifically? That’s often where people decide between embedded Tomcat vs. Jetty. |
0 commit comments