Fixes a lot of tags

marcusoftnet · marcusoftnet · commit dbf1deb17a52 · 2025-05-09T09:28:45.000+02:00
diff --git a/_posts/2006-12-13-ybs-era-to-end.md b/_posts/2006-12-13-ybs-era-to-end.md
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ layout: post
 title: YBS-era to an end?
 date: 2006-12-13T07:11:00.000Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Brass Band
+  - Marcus private
 modified_time: 2006-12-14T06:37:53.785Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-6887639483124177391
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2006/12/ybs-era-to-end.html
diff --git a/_posts/2007-10-30-visual-studio-2008-videos-ii.md b/_posts/2007-10-30-visual-studio-2008-videos-ii.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: Visual Studio 2008 videos II
 date: 2007-10-30T11:50:00.000Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - Tools
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2010-12-14T15:20:33.395Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-8279432722258789434
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2007/10/visual-studio-2008-videos-ii.html
diff --git a/_posts/2007-11-14-visual-studio-tip-of-day.md b/_posts/2007-11-14-visual-studio-tip-of-day.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: Visual Studio Tip of the Day
 date: 2007-11-14T07:03:00.000Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - Tools
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2010-12-14T15:20:33.386Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-6943062304900435420
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2007/11/visual-studio-tip-of-day.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-04-09-required-file-with-ialink3-could-not-be.md b/_posts/2008-04-09-required-file-with-ialink3-could-not-be.md
@@ -4,7 +4,9 @@ title: Required file 'alink.dll with IAlink3' could not be found - and the solut
   to it
 date: 2008-04-09T06:03:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - Life of a consultant
 modified_time: 2008-04-09T06:03:57.771Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-6751370494112070271
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/04/required-file-with-ialink3-could-not-be.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-05-06-made-me-happy.md b/_posts/2008-05-06-made-me-happy.md
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ layout: post
 title: Made me smile
 date: 2008-05-06T05:58:00.002Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Marcus private
 modified_time: 2008-05-06T06:45:08.976Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-7543601996402260284
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/05/made-me-happy.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-05-23-shortcuts.md b/_posts/2008-05-23-shortcuts.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: Shortcuts
 date: 2008-05-23T09:17:00.004Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - Tools
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2010-12-14T15:20:33.277Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-8412792532818677787
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/05/shortcuts.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-05-26-visual-studio-2008-intellisense-not.md b/_posts/2008-05-26-visual-studio-2008-intellisense-not.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: Visual Studio 2008 Intellisense not working - and the fix
 date: 2008-05-26T10:33:00.004Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - Tools
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2010-12-14T15:21:03.997Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3920776313334347485
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/05/visual-studio-2008-intellisense-not.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-05-29-presentations-follow-up.md b/_posts/2008-05-29-presentations-follow-up.md
@@ -3,7 +3,11 @@ layout: post
 title: Presentations follow up
 date: 2008-05-29T05:30:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Life of a consultant
+  - Agile
+  - Lean
+  - Euphonium
 modified_time: 2008-05-29T05:30:13.864Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-5439936308992650437
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/05/presentations-follow-up.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-09-05-more-on-enterprise-library-entlib.md b/_posts/2008-09-05-more-on-enterprise-library-entlib.md
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ layout: post
 title: More on Enterprise Library (EntLib), ODP.NET and type mapping
 date: 2008-09-04T18:08:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2008-09-04T18:08:58.121Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-6357478391735284163
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/09/more-on-enterprise-library-entlib.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-01-rockbox-and-upgrading-my-iriver.md b/_posts/2008-10-01-rockbox-and-upgrading-my-iriver.md
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ layout: post
 title: RockBox and upgrading my IRiver
 date: 2008-10-01T10:26:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Tools
+  - Marcus private
 modified_time: 2008-10-01T10:28:28.964Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-5877411300635892001
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/rockbox-and-upgrading-my-iriver.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-02-replacing-battery-of-h320.md b/_posts/2008-10-02-replacing-battery-of-h320.md
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ layout: post
 title: Replacing battery of H320
 date: 2008-10-02T06:08:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Tools
+  - Marcus private
 modified_time: 2008-10-02T06:14:01.647Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-8271451601506810371
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/replacing-battery-of-h320.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-14-back-from-road-and-well-again.md b/_posts/2008-10-14-back-from-road-and-well-again.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: Back from the road and well again
 date: 2008-10-14T16:04:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Brass band
+  - Euphonium
+  - Marcus private
 modified_time: 2008-10-14T16:04:13.877Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3239158553466281381
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/back-from-road-and-well-again.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-20-configuration-of-wcf-binding.md b/_posts/2008-10-20-configuration-of-wcf-binding.md
@@ -3,13 +3,16 @@ layout: post
 title: Configuration of WCF-binding
 date: 2008-10-20T09:13:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - WCF
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2008-10-20T09:20:16.964Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-4401615870941869968
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/configuration-of-wcf-binding.html
 ---
 
-This area is (in the words of [Juwal Löwy](http://www.idesign.net)) "truly vast". And as I read somewhere else most of the properties doesn't make sense to the common programmer. We (yeah, I'm one of the common ones) just want it to work.
+This area is (in the words of [Juval Löwy](http://www.idesign.net)) "truly vast". And as I read somewhere else most of the properties doesn't make sense to the common programmer. We (yeah, I'm one of the common ones) just want it to work.
 
 Also, when it comes to configuring WCF services Microsoft has gone the complete opposite way from their normal way of doing things; normally Microsoft hides everything you don't need to know from you and you'll have to dig to get to the advanced things. When it comes to WCF all the possible values are shown right off - scared the living daylights of of me. Just add a reference to a WCF-service and check your client .config-file.
 
@@ -18,6 +21,6 @@ So what to do - well I'm sorry but you'll need to know quite a bit of informatio
 - The book [Programming WCF Service](http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596526993/) (Chapter 1 and 10 on these subjects. Buy it - you'll need it!
 - [Fundamentals of WCF Security](http://www.devx.com/codemag/Article/33342)
 - The excellent tool for WCF-configuration in Visual Studio... (Christer Cederborg tipped me on this one, thanks). Go to Tools->WCF Service Configuration Editor and you'll get a lot of help when you configure your service and clients...
-- Here is [another great introductionary article](http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/2007/02/12/WCFConfigurationComplexity.aspx) to the subject
+- Here is [another great introductory article](http://www.winterdom.com/weblog/2007/02/12/WCFConfigurationComplexity.aspx) to the subject
 
 I'll try to post some examples of how to do certain things as I need to do them. Here is the first: [How to configure wsHttpBinding for no security](https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/wcf-config-how-to-configure.html)
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-20-msbuild-refactor-and-targets-in-other.md b/_posts/2008-10-20-msbuild-refactor-and-targets-in-other.md
@@ -10,13 +10,13 @@ blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3420428001447646419
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/msbuild-refactor-and-targets-in-other.html
 ---
 
-I found a very niffty little feature of MSBuild, that is really helpful when it comes to structuring your build file.
+I found a very nifty little feature of MSBuild, that is really helpful when it comes to structuring your build file.
 
 In MSBuild the "sub-routines" are called targets and works just like expected, that is you can call the targets and invoke them in the order you like. BUT, there are no way of sending parameters to them - which at first are very hard to understand.
 
 From [this article](http://dotnet.sys-con.com/node/253420) I learned how to do it. And it's not to hard. But it's a bit of a hack... in my opinion.
 
-Actually it's easier to describe it as it's intended from the outset, to call targets in other files. Imagine that you create a MSBuild-file called DeployScript.proj with a target called DeployIt. In order to deploy to different environments we use some variables that instructs MSBuild to deploy to different paths for example. Like the $(PublishWebSitePath) in the example below:
+Actually it's easier to describe it as it's intended from the outset, to call targets in other files. Imagine that you create a MSBuild-file called DeployScript.proj with a target called DeployIt. In order to deploy to different environments we use some variables that instructs MSBuild to deploy to different paths for example. Like the `$(PublishWebSitePath)` in the example below:
 
 ```xml
 <RemoveDir
@@ -37,4 +37,4 @@ We can now call the targets of the DeployScript.proj-file from another file, wit
 
 And now it's quite easy to understand how to call targets in your own MSBuild-file with parameters. It's works the same way as above. You just give the current build-file name in the projects-value.
 
-Using this technique you'll get a much better way of structuring your build-files. And maybe even get some reusable stuff for your next project...
+Using this technique you'll get a much better way of structuring your build-files. And maybe even get some reusable stuff for your next project...
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-20-wcf-config-how-to-configure.md b/_posts/2008-10-20-wcf-config-how-to-configure.md
@@ -10,29 +10,32 @@ blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-1325842803821633001
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/wcf-config-how-to-configure.html
 ---
 
+Yes - I know that this is quite rare but if you want something really easy in place then this is how to use wsHttpBinding with no security:
 
-Yes - I know that this is quite rare but if you want something really
-easy in place then this is how to use wsHttpBinding with no security:
+```xml
+<services>
+  <service name="FaktureringsTjanst"
+    <endpoint
+      address=""
+      binding="wsHttpBinding"
+      bindingConfiguration="myBindingConfigurationWsHttp"
+      contract="IContract"
+      behaviorConfiguration="FaktureringsTjanstBehavior" \>
+  </service>
+</services>
 
-> \<service name="FaktureringsTjanst"
-> \<endpoint address=""
-> binding="wsHttpBinding"
-> bindingConfiguration="myBindingConfigurationWsHttp"
-> contract="IContract"
-> behaviorConfiguration="FaktureringsTjanstBehavior" /\>
-> \</service\>
-> \</services\>
->
-> \<!-- Bindings --\>
-> \<bindings\>
-> \<wsHttpBinding\>
-> \<binding name="myBindingConfigurationWsHttp"
-> maxReceivedMessageSize="500000"
-> sendTimeout="00:05:00"
-> receiveTimeout="00:05:00"\>
-> \<security mode="None"\>
-> \<message clientCredentialType="None" /\>
-> \</security\>
-> \</binding\>
-> \</wsHttpBinding\>
-> \</bindings\>
+<!-- Bindings -->
+<bindings>
+  <wsHttpBinding>
+  <binding
+    name="myBindingConfigurationWsHttp"
+    maxReceivedMessageSize="500000"
+    sendTimeout="00:05:00"
+    receiveTimeout="00:05:00">
+  <security mode="None">
+  <message clientCredentialType="None" \>
+  </security>
+  </binding>
+  </wsHttpBinding>
+</bindings>
+```
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-22-more-on-wcf-configuration.md b/_posts/2008-10-22-more-on-wcf-configuration.md
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@ layout: post
 title: More on WCF configuration
 date: 2008-10-22T11:26:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Programming
+  - WCF
+  - .NET
 modified_time: 2008-10-22T11:26:35.756Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3177796519915879546
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/more-on-wcf-configuration.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-23-wcf-self-hosting-and-configuration.md b/_posts/2008-10-23-wcf-self-hosting-and-configuration.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/wcf-self-hosting-and-configu
 
 One of the really cool features of WCF is the possibility to be able to change binding in the config... Of course the transport need to be supported by the host. For example you can't use TCP/IP transport in a web-site hosted service.
 
-So - you'll have to create the host by yourself - selfhosting. However there are some nasty configuration to be done in order to get the service to work. Otherwise you'll get this error message:
+So - you'll have to create the host by yourself - self hosting. However there are some nasty configuration to be done in order to get the service to work. Otherwise you'll get this error message:
 
 > HTTP could not register URL [http://+:[yourport]](http://+:%5Byourport%5D)
 
diff --git a/_posts/2008-10-30-right-way-of-calling-mstest-in-tfs.md b/_posts/2008-10-30-right-way-of-calling-mstest-in-tfs.md
@@ -12,26 +12,21 @@ blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-4478037245458920181
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/right-way-of-calling-mstest-in-tfs.html
 ---
 
+OK - sometimes it just to confess - I took a chance, or didn't know what I was doing - call it what you want.
 
-OK - sometimes it just to confess - I took a chance, or didn't know
-what I was doing - call it what you want.
-
-In TFS Build-scripts there are a much nicer way of calling MSTest than
-the [Exec-task as I
-suggested.](https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/how-to-run-mstest-with-publish.html)
-There is already a task for it, called
-[TestToolsTask.](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa721750%28VS.80%29.aspx)
-With this task you can much easier reach all the properties you need.
-And it even contains some undocumented features such as the
-[TestContainer](http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2006/11/09/updated-version-of-new-testtoolstask.aspx)-property.
+In TFS Build-scripts there are a much nicer way of calling MSTest than the [Exec-task as I suggested.](https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/10/how-to-run-mstest-with-publish.html) There is already a task for it, called [TestToolsTask.](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa721750%28VS.80%29.aspx) With this task you can much easier reach all the properties you need. And it even contains some undocumented features such as the [TestContainer](http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2006/11/09/updated-version-of-new-testtoolstask.aspx)-property.
 
 Here is my updated version on how to call the task:
 
->     <TestToolsTask   TestContainers="$(BinariesRoot)\Debug\Company.Service.Host.Test.Integration.dll"
->               BuildFlavor="%(ConfigurationToBuild.FlavorToBuild)"
->               Platform="%(ConfigurationToBuild.PlatformToBuild)"
->               PublishServer="$(TeamFoundationServerUrl)"
->               PublishBuild="$(BuildNumber)"
->               PathToResultsFilesRoot="$(TestResultsRoot)\..\IntegrationTestResults"
->               TeamProject="Betalningsplattformen2"
->               ContinueOnError="true" />
+```xml
+<TestToolsTask
+  TestContainers="$(BinariesRoot)\Debug\Company.Service.Host.Test.Integration.dll"
+  BuildFlavor="%(ConfigurationToBuild.FlavorToBuild)"
+  Platform="%(ConfigurationToBuild.PlatformToBuild)"
+  PublishServer="$(TeamFoundationServerUrl)"
+  PublishBuild="$(BuildNumber)"
+  PathToResultsFilesRoot="$(TestResultsRoot)\..\IntegrationTestResults"
+  TeamProject="Betalningsplattformen2"
+  ContinueOnError="true"
+/>
+```
diff --git a/_posts/2008-11-05-blogging-in-two-places-avega-group-blog.md b/_posts/2008-11-05-blogging-in-two-places-avega-group-blog.md
@@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ layout: post
 title: Blogging in two places - Avega Group Blog
 date: 2008-11-05T07:39:00.001Z
 author: Marcus Hammarberg
-tags: null
+tags:
+  - Marcus private
+  - Life of a consultant
 modified_time: 2008-11-05T21:48:02.048Z
 blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3049897076598246711
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/11/blogging-in-two-places-avega-group-blog.html
diff --git a/_posts/2008-11-07-agile-testing-how-we-get-it-to-work.md b/_posts/2008-11-07-agile-testing-how-we-get-it-to-work.md
@@ -13,56 +13,27 @@ blogger_id: tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36533086.post-3797196069848262973
 blogger_orig_url: https://www.marcusoft.net/2008/11/agile-testing-how-we-get-it-to-work.html
 ---
 
+This week I have made two discoveries that really has made me happy. They are not news by any means but I has been like they have clicked into place in my brain.
 
-This week I have made two discoveries that really has made me happy.
-They are not news by any means but I has been like they have clicked
-into place in my brain.
+The first one is surrounding the subject of testing in agile projects, which a [lot of people](http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=testing+in+agile+projects&btnG=Sök&meta=) seems to have opinions about - but I haven't heard anyone go: "Do like this!". I suspect that it has to do with current testing process are rigid on many companies and there is a reluctancy towards changing the quality assurance process. Also the amount of regression testing increases for each sprint.
 
-The first one is surrounding the subject of testing in agile projects,
-which a [lot of
-people](http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=testing+in+agile+projects&btnG=Sök&meta=)
-seems to have opinions about - but I haven't heard anyone go: "Do like
-this!". I suspect that it has to do with current testing process are
-rigid on many companies and there is a reluctantancy towards changing
-the quality assurance process. Also the amount of regression testing
-increases for each sprint.
-
-We have had some trouble to get testing to work smoothly in our
-projects, but we are closing in on a solution. I do not claim to have
-the answerer or not even know much about the theories behind this big
-subject - but this works fine for us. And the solution have two
-trademarks that I like:
+We have had some trouble to get testing to work smoothly in our projects, but we are closing in on a solution. I do not claim to have the answerer or not even know much about the theories behind this big subject - but this works fine for us. And the solution have two trademarks that I like:
 
 - it simple ([KISS](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle))
 - I haven't invented anything (don't think - steal)
 
 OK - finally. Here is how we make testing in our Scrum project work:
 
-we add a column to our sprint backlog items stating "How to test (this
-sprint backlog item)"
-
-we have a [definition of
-done](http://www.scrumalliance.org/articles/37-are-we-there-yet) that
-includes:
-
-- unit tests to cover all code
-- tested according to the "How to test" in a separate test
-    environment. These tests are made by a tester in order to challenge
-    the functionality as well as how it's working.
-- integrationtest created/updated to test the sprint backlog item.
-    These test are not written by the same developer that wrote the code
+- we add a column to our sprint backlog items stating "How to test (this sprint backlog item)"
+- we have a [definition of done](http://www.scrumalliance.org/articles/37-are-we-there-yet) that includes:
+  - unit tests to cover all code
+  - tested according to the "How to test" in a separate test environment. These tests are made by a tester in order to challenge the functionality as well as how it's working.
+  - integration test created/updated to test the sprint backlog item. These test are not written by the same developer that wrote the code
 
-There are some other things in our definition of done also (maybe
-another post) of course.
+There are some other things in our definition of done also (maybe another post) of course.
 
-I think that combining manual testing of each sprint backlog item and
-keeping automated regression/integration tests in sync will give you a
-good quality assurance for things produced in the sprint.
+I think that combining manual testing of each sprint backlog item and keeping automated regression/integration tests in sync will give you a good quality assurance for things produced in the sprint.
 
-Yes I know that Scrum dictates that you should take each "done" backlog
-item all the way to production, but I don't think that's feasible for
-large organizations. With our approach you at least can skip a large
-amount of system test and go directly to system integration test or
-acceptance test, in the normal test process.
+Yes I know that Scrum dictates that you should take each "done" backlog item all the way to production, but I don't think that's feasible for large organizations. With our approach you at least can skip a large amount of system test and go directly to system integration test or acceptance test, in the normal test process.
 
 As I said - this is my two cents. I really like the idea. Comments?
diff --git a/_posts/2008-11-10-swedish-brass-band-championships-2008_10.md b/_posts/2008-11-10-swedish-brass-band-championships-2008_10.md
diff --git a/_posts/2008-11-11-great-site-for-msbuild-recipes.md b/_posts/2008-11-11-great-site-for-msbuild-recipes.md
diff --git a/_posts/2008-12-10-soap-ui-great-way-to-do-integration.md b/_posts/2008-12-10-soap-ui-great-way-to-do-integration.md
diff --git a/_posts/2008-12-11-uta058-test-engine-cannot-run-tests-in.md b/_posts/2008-12-11-uta058-test-engine-cannot-run-tests-in.md
diff --git a/_posts/2008-12-15-cheat-sheet-for-resharper-40.md b/_posts/2008-12-15-cheat-sheet-for-resharper-40.md
diff --git a/_posts/2010-06-08-in-my-current-project-we-have-had.md b/_posts/2010-06-08-in-my-current-project-we-have-had.md
diff --git a/_posts/2013-08-06-repost-mob-programming--full-team-full-throttle.md b/_posts/2013-08-06-repost-mob-programming--full-team-full-throttle.md
diff --git a/_posts/2014-03-03-a-little-something-about-document.md b/_posts/2014-03-03-a-little-something-about-document.md
diff --git a/_posts/2020-06-05-building-teams---where-our-training-starts.md b/_posts/2020-06-05-building-teams---where-our-training-starts.md
