Replies: 1 comment
-
|
alternative: create a template sensor based on your sources... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using the PV surplus charging blueprint and would like to understand the best way to handle the battery charge and discharge power values from my Growatt inverter.
The inverter provides two separate values:
Charge PowerandDischarge Power. Both values are non-negative, but they are never positive at the same time.An issue arises due to the following limitations in the blueprint:
Charge Power + Discharge Power).This leads to the following situation:
Charge Power > 0. The aggregated sum value is therefore > 0. However, the inversion flag would need to be set toTRUEto represent "negative = charging."Discharge Power > 0. The aggregated sum value is again > 0. In this case, the inversion flag would need to be set toFALSEto represent "positive = discharging."Since the inversion setting cannot dynamically adapt to the operating state, the current functionality does not allow correct representation of both charging and discharging scenarios.
Possible solutions could be:
Discharge Power - Charge Power), orOr is there any alternative way to implement this use case within the existing functionality?
Thank you for any pointers!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions