Skip to content

Inquiry about the Zero Element in the Measurement Jacobian Matrix \(H_n\) #93

@LiuJingCheng6

Description

@LiuJingCheng6

Hello, I have some question on Eq. 37. In the section where the measurement Jacobian matrix (H_n) is defined, specifically in the formula (H_{n}=A\left[\begin{array}{lllllll} 0 & R_{n}^{IMUT} & 0 & -\left(p_{n}^{c}\right)_{\times} & 0 & B & C\end{array}\right]), I am puzzled about why the first term corresponding to (R_n^{IMU}) is zero.

As we know, the velocity (v_n^c) is expressed as (v_{n}^{c}=R_{n}^{c T} R_{n}^{IMUT} v_{n}^{IMU}+\left(\omega_{n}\right) \times p_{n}^{c}), which clearly involves the rotation matrix (R_n^{IMU}). Intuitively, one might expect that changes in (R_n^{IMU}) would have an impact on the measurement vector (y_n). But in the construction of (H_n), the derivative of (y_n) with respect to (R_n^{IMU}) seems to be zero.

Are there any specific assumptions or physical interpretations that I might have missed?

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions