Why WrapDB over an existing tool like Conan? #10671
Unanswered
wbehrens-on-gh
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
The WrapDB isn't limited to C/C++ dependencies, for example it can be used to provide custom_target program utilities or e.g. wayland-protocols XML data inputs. It also provides seamless on-demand fallback. You can use it to do full-application LTO. Also, it's built in, because Meson needed to provide subproject support either way. ... That being said, Meson is happy to use conan-provided dependencies as "system" versions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was wondering what the reason/advantage of creating and maintaining WrapDB rather then using an existing technology like Conan (which is also written in Python) to manage C/C++ dependencies?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions