|
1 | 1 | {"date":"2025-10-14","time":"12:45","summary":"Formalized the RMG physics initiative with specifications, code skeleton, and dissemination plan, outlining next implementation steps.","topics":[{"topic":"Project specification","what":"Drafted SPEC.md capturing objectives, architecture, and roadmap","why":"User requested a formal spec to anchor development","context":"RMG forge concept emerging from MetaGraph work","issue":"Need structured plan before coding","resolution":"Wrote SPEC.md in repo","future_work":"Implement deliverables per phases","time_percent":30},{"topic":"Core readiness checklist","what":"Defined criteria for branching into forge build","why":"User asked when to start forge","context":"MetaGraph core nearing completion","issue":"Unclear readiness signal","resolution":"Authored CORE-READINESS.md","future_work":"Complete checklist items","time_percent":15},{"topic":"Dissemination strategy","what":"Outlined reproducibility and outreach steps","why":"User uncertain how to publish results","context":"Non-academic background","issue":"Need roadmap to share findings","resolution":"Created DISSEMINATION.md","future_work":"Execute plan post-results","time_percent":20},{"topic":"Philosophical and feasibility analysis","what":"Discussed implications and confidence of technical choices","why":"User probing motivation and soundness","context":"RMG as universe model","issue":"Assess legitimacy","resolution":"Provided analysis and confidence scores","future_work":"Validate via implementation","time_percent":20},{"topic":"Code skeleton delivery","what":"Packaged RMG forge skeleton zip with observables","why":"Enable immediate experimentation","context":"Need tangible starting point","issue":"No runnable tools yet","resolution":"Created zip and documented usage","future_work":"Expand into full engine","time_percent":15}],"key_decisions":["Adopt typed open-graph + DPOI framework","Prioritize QCA compilation for rule enforcement"],"action_items":[{"task":"Implement minimal DPOI matcher and QCA loop","owner":"James"},{"task":"Run first spectral-dimension experiment","owner":"James"}]} |
2 | 2 | {"date":"2025-10-15","time":"17:32","summary":"Reviewed spec/docs, attempted VF2/QCA integration, hit clang-tidy walls, then realigned the repo to the documented STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER lint profile and updated guidance.","topics":[{"topic":"Spec & skeleton intake","what":"Re-read AGENTS.md and core docs plus studied the rmg-c skeleton drops.","why":"Needed fresh context before porting the DPOI/QCA implementation.","context":"Existing stubs were too light for the forge roadmap.","issue":"Had to absorb prior work and constraints.","resolution":"Completed a full pass over specs and codebases.","future_work":"Apply the insights during the next integration attempt.","time_percent":25},{"topic":"DPOI/QCA port attempt","what":"Began replacing stubs with VF2 matcher, scheduler, and commit logic from the skeleton.","why":"To land a production-grade DPOI + QCA loop in meta-graph/core.","context":"New matcher required arena utilities, touched sets, journaled rewrites.","issue":"clang-tidy flagged extensive naming/complexity violations and recursion bans.","resolution":"Aborted the port for now to avoid violating repository lint policy.","future_work":"Refactor matcher/commit into clang-tidy-friendly building blocks before retrying.","time_percent":45},{"topic":"clang-tidy canonization","what":"Restored STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER_NO_MERCY config and synced AGENTS.md to match.","why":"AGENTS.md and the live .clang-tidy had diverged, causing confusion.","context":"Developers need one source of truth for lint rules.","issue":"Repo was enforcing a milder profile than the documented one.","resolution":"Replaced .clang-tidy, updated documentation, and logged the change.","future_work":"Run full lint/CI sweep and monitor future merges under the tougher rules.","time_percent":30}],"key_decisions":["Delay the VF2/QCA merge until the code can satisfy STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER lint thresholds.","Make the STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER profile the single source of truth for clang-tidy."],"action_items":[{"task":"Refactor the VF2 matcher and DPO commit code into lint-compliant units before re-attempting integration","owner":"James"},{"task":"Run clang-tidy/CI against the restored STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER config to confirm the repository is green","owner":"James"}]} |
3 | 3 | {"date":"2025-10-15","time":"17:40","summary":"Recorded the staged integration plan for the XTRA skeleton, reiterated the tidy→integrate→tidy loop, and flagged action items for the next agent.","topics":[{"topic":"Integration roadmap","what":"Authored docs/dpoi-qca-integration-plan.md detailing the STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER-compatible rollout (six phases).","why":"Provide a concrete path for merging typed ports, seeded VF2, journals, and epochs without tripping lint.","context":"Previous attempt stalled on clang-tidy; new drop introduces attachment pushouts + port caps.","issue":"No written plan previously existed.","resolution":"Documented phases 0–5 covering cleanup, structural imports, matcher swap, pushouts, QCA wiring, and final lint pass.","future_work":"Execute each phase sequentially, running clang-tidy between milestones.","time_percent":40},{"topic":"Task triage","what":"Noted the immediate loop: tidy clang → integrate new hotness → tidy clang.","why":"User emphasized this as the canonical workflow.","context":"Integration will span multiple PRs.","issue":"Need everyone following the same cadence.","resolution":"Captured the loop in docs and this debrief.","future_work":"Apply the loop per phase.","time_percent":30},{"topic":"Skeleton intake reminder","what":"Summarized XTRA contents (typed ports, attachment journaling+epochs, SIMD VF2, diff rollback, debug invariants).","why":"Next agent should read the drop before coding.","context":"rmg-c-rmg-skeleton-xtra.zip is the source of truth.","issue":"Risk of overlooking new capabilities.","resolution":"Mentioned highlights and pointed to the plan.","future_work":"Reference the drop during integration.","time_percent":30}],"key_decisions":["Integrate the XTRA skeleton via the documented phased plan.","Flank every integration step with STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER clang-tidy runs."],"action_items":[{"task":"Run Phase 0 of docs/dpoi-qca-integration-plan.md (restore lint-clean baseline)","owner":"Next agent"},{"task":"Proceed to Phase 1 once lint is green, repeating the tidy→integrate→tidy cycle","owner":"Next agent"}]} |
4 | | -``` |
5 | 4 | {"date": "2025-10-15", "time": "08:06", "summary": "Restored the STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER lint baseline, drafted the staged DPOI/QCA integration plan, and opened the pull request.", "topics": [{"topic": "Lint baseline", "what": "Replaced heavy prototypes with lint-compliant stubs and ensured build/tests pass", "why": "Phase 0 requires a clean slate before integrating the XTRA skeleton", "context": "Existing matcher/QCA experiments violated STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER limits", "issue": "clang-tidy and analyzer were flagging hundreds of violations", "resolution": "Authored minimal placeholder implementations plus helper headers/sources to regain zero-warning state", "future_work": "Reintroduce full functionality during Phases 1-4 while keeping lint green", "time_percent": 35}, {"topic": "Integration plan", "what": "Captured a six-phase roadmap and generated GitHub issue drafts", "why": "Ensure future agents have a deterministic path for the XTRA drop", "context": "New drop adds typed ports, attachment journaling, and seeded VF2", "issue": "Work lacked a tracked, lint-aware rollout plan", "resolution": "Wrote docs/dpoi-qca-integration-plan.md and roadmap issue templates", "future_work": "File the issues on GitHub and execute Phase 1 next", "time_percent": 35}, {"topic": "Documentation & PR", "what": "Updated F013 spec listings and opened the feature branch PR", "why": "Align docs with new feature scope and surface the work for review", "context": "F.013 spec now lives alongside the plan; PR needed for review cycle", "issue": "Docs/features README was missing the F013 entry", "resolution": "Linked the spec, pushed the branch, and created PR #70", "future_work": "Collect review feedback and proceed with Phase 1 implementation", "time_percent": 30}], "key_decisions": ["Stage integration via the documented six-phase plan before touching production logic", "Use STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER as the single lint profile and hold the tidy->integrate->tidy loop"], "action_items": [{"task": "File the phase issues from docs/roadmap on GitHub and start Phase 1 struct imports", "owner": "Next agent"}]} |
6 | 5 | {"date":"2025-10-15","time":"20:15","summary":"Imported the Phase 1 structural scaffolding for DPOI/QCA while keeping the placeholder runtime intact and lint-ready.","topics":[{"topic":"Phase 1 structural imports","what":"Added port direction enums, interface signatures, attachment update scaffolding, and dual epochs to headers","why":"Phase 1 requires structural types in place before integrating matcher and commit behavior","context":"docs/dpoi-qca-integration-plan.md prescribes typed ports and epochs from the XTRA drop","issue":"Runtime headers lacked the data needed to express typed ports and attachment epochs","resolution":"Extended rmg/rule headers with the new structs and ensured constructors zero-initialize them for future phases","future_work":"Consume the new definitions in matcher and commit logic during Phases 2-4","time_percent":40},{"topic":"Test and build updates","what":"Updated rule helpers and unit tests to initialize and assert defaults for the new fields","why":"Need verification that the placeholder runtime stays consistent until behavior is wired in","context":"Existing tests only covered baseline matching and ticks","issue":"Without checks the new structs could regress unnoticed","resolution":"Initialized port caps to UINT16_MAX, asserted zeroed interface data, and left runtime logic untouched","future_work":"Add behavior-driven tests once matcher and commit pathways read these fields","time_percent":35},{"topic":"Verification constraints","what":"Rebuilt, ran ctest, and attempted clang-tidy under STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER","why":"Maintain the tidy→integrate→tidy workflow","context":"Phase 1 acceptance requires a lint pass","issue":"Local environment is missing the clang-tidy binary","resolution":"Captured the failure after confirming build and test success","future_work":"Re-run clang-tidy -p build once the tool is installed or available in CI","time_percent":25}],"key_decisions":["Retain UINT16_MAX defaults for new node port caps until matcher enforcement lands","Defer GitHub issue creation to the next agent while noting the requirement"],"action_items":[{"task":"Run clang-tidy -p build after installing clang-tidy to validate STRICTNESS_GOD_TIER compliance","owner":"Next agent"},{"task":"Create live GitHub issues for Phase 0/1 trackers when repository access permits","owner":"Next agent"}]} |
7 | 6 |
|
|
22 | 21 | {"date":"2025-10-20","time":"15:12","summary":"Taught the security audit to recognize safe-stack builds and dump details when failing in CI.","topics":[{"topic":"Audit false positive","what":"Detect __safestack_unsafe_stack_ptr alongside __stack_chk_fail","why":"Linux Release builds use Clang safe-stack so the previous detector flagged stack canaries as missing","context":"Quality Matrix security audit kept aborting despite hardening flags","issue":"Audit only looked for __stack_chk_fail which isn’t emitted with safe-stack","resolution":"Count either symbol and continue to report stack protection as enabled","future_work":"Keep an eye on future toolchain upgrades in case symbol names change","time_percent":70},{"topic":"CI diagnostics","what":"Emit the full .ignored/security-audit.txt before exiting","why":"Artifact upload isn’t always reliable, making it hard to inspect failures","context":"GitHub Actions quality matrix","issue":"Engineers could not see what triggered the critical flag","resolution":"Surface the report inline when the script exits non-zero","future_work":"None","time_percent":30}],"key_decisions":[],"action_items":[]} |
23 | 22 | {"date":"2025-10-20","time":"15:55","summary":"Closed the loop on clang-tidy’s implicit-bool complaint by reinstating the explicit cast and confirmed the audit now reports PIE correctly in CI.","topics":[{"topic":"Digits buffer assert","what":"Restored the (_Bool) cast in the _Static_assert guarding the 64-byte scratch array","why":"GNU-GON-CRY clang-tidy treats int-to-bool conversions as errors","context":"readability-implicit-bool-conversion flagged the newer form","issue":"CI failed after removing the cast","resolution":"Reintroduced the explicit cast to satisfy the lint rule","future_work":"None","time_percent":60},{"topic":"CI audit parity","what":"Verified the updated PIE detection logic against the build artifacts","why":"Ensure Linux release jobs stop flagging false negatives","context":"Security audit now prints the report inline on failure","issue":"Needed a local run to confirm","resolution":"Ran the audit targeting build/ and observed PIE marked enabled","future_work":"Monitor the next Quality Matrix run","time_percent":40}],"key_decisions":[],"action_items":[]} |
24 | 23 | {"date":"2025-10-20","time":"11:35","summary":"Unblocked the sanitizer CI leg by disabling conflicting ASAN flags when running the MSAN job.","topics":[{"topic":"Sanitizer matrix","what":"Gated METAGRAPH_*SAN toggles per workflow matrix leg","why":"CI memory sanitizer run failed because both -fsanitize=memory and -fsanitize=address were set","context":"GitHub Actions sanitizers job on feat/minimal-dpoi-qca-loop","issue":"ASAN defaults stayed enabled when requesting MSAN, causing clang to reject the flag combination","resolution":"Updated ci.yml to map each matrix entry to explicit METAGRAPH_{A,U,T,M}SAN settings before invoking CMake","future_work":"Watch the next CI cycle in case MSAN still lacks instrumented runtimes","time_percent":100}],"key_decisions":["Disable ASAN/UBSAN when invoking the MSAN and TSAN legs"],"action_items":[]} |
25 | | -``` |
26 | 24 | {"date":"2025-10-20","time":"12:18","summary":"Split historical debriefs into DEBRIEF.json and hardened CI lint tooling for PR #70.","topics":[{"topic":"Debrief archive","what":"Moved JSONL history from AGENTS.md into a dedicated DEBRIEF.json and updated docs","why":"Review feedback flagged repeated markdown lint issues in AGENTS.md","context":"PR #70 documentation polish","issue":"Embedded code fence kept breaking lint and reviews","resolution":"Created DEBRIEF.json, refreshed AGENTS.md guidance, and synced DEBRIEF_FORMAT.md","future_work":"Monitor future agents to ensure they append to the new file","time_percent":40},{"topic":"Sanitizer workflow","what":"Added unsupported-sanitizer guard and compile_commands.json validation to CI","why":"Reviewer requested early failure when matrix entries drift","context":"GitHub Actions sanitizers and clang-tidy jobs","issue":"Previous case block lacked fallback and tidy job assumed compile DB","resolution":"Extended bash case with explicit error path and added verification step","future_work":"Watch next CI run for regressions","time_percent":30},{"topic":"Commit lint dependencies","what":"Introduced package.json plus npm ci step so commitlint resolves cleanly","why":"PR gatekeeper job failed to locate @commitlint/config-conventional","context":"scripts/ci/lint-commits.sh invoked via pr-guard.yml","issue":"npx attempted to download missing modules on every run and failed","resolution":"Added devDependencies, npm ci step, and switched script to npx --no-install","future_work":"Consider caching npm modules if the workflow becomes a bottleneck","time_percent":30}],"key_decisions":["Store debrief history exclusively in DEBRIEF.json to avoid AGENTS.md churn","Rely on npm-managed commitlint packages instead of ephemeral npx downloads"],"action_items":[]} |
0 commit comments