You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pull Request resolved: #906
This is an attempt to do an apples-to-apples comparison to P1903314366, to eliminate any non-channel related overheads.
The results replicate previous findings: that our throughput is hampered by excess data copies (either outright or through growing buffers in the encoding stack), and of tokio-level network i/o overheads. Both are being addressed. These benchmarks should help to serve as validation as this work lands.
ghstack-source-id: 303814001
@exported-using-ghexport
Differential Revision: [D80260732](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D80260732/)
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: hyperactor/Cargo.toml
+5-1Lines changed: 5 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1
-
# @generated by autocargo from //monarch/hyperactor:[channel_benchmarks,hyperactor,hyperactor-example-derive,hyperactor-example-stream]
1
+
# @generated by autocargo from //monarch/hyperactor:[channel_benchmarks,hyperactor,hyperactor-example-channel,hyperactor-example-derive,hyperactor-example-stream]
0 commit comments