Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
|
Hello,
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
-
|
OFFICIAL
Hi Simon, please see my response in blue.
Looking forward to hear from you. Is there anything I need to change to make the outputs for each soil layers?
Thanks,
Dr Sri Adiyanti
Senior Research Scientist – Hydrodynamic Biogeochemical Modeller | Rivers and Estuaries Science
Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
17 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151, AUSTRALIA
P: +61 8 9278 0953
E: ***@***.******@***.***>
…________________________________
From: Simon Lüdke ***@***.***>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 11:36 PM
To: mhm-ufz/mHM ***@***.***>
Cc: Sri Adiyanti ***@***.***>; Author ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [mhm-ufz/mHM] Soil moistures: optimized parameters (Discussion #124)
[External Email] This email was sent from outside the department – be cautious, particularly with links and attachments.
Hello,
sorry for the late reply. I hope you could already solve your issue but if it is still unsolved I would need a bit more information about your configuration?
1.
How did you specify the number of soil horizons in the &soildata section of the mhm.nml?
iFlag_soilDB = 0
!
!> [mm] soil depth down to which organic matter is possible
tillageDepth = 500 !previously 200
!
!> No. of soil horizons to be modeled
nSoilHorizons_mHM = 3
!
! soil depth information
!> IF (iFlag_soilDB = 0)
!> Provide below the soil_Depth() for 1,2,..,*n-1* soil horizons. Depth of the last layer(n) is taken from the soil LUT
!> IF (iFlag_soilDB = 1)
!> Provide below the soil_Depth() for every 1,2..n-1,*n* soil horizons. You must have soil_class-id gridded file for each layer
!> Also check your tillage layer depth. It should conform with one of the below specified soil_Depth.
! !> Soil_Horizon Depth[mm] ! bottom depth of soil horizons w.r.t. ground surface (positive downwards)
soil_Depth(1) = 200
soil_Depth(2) = 950
2.
What Input data did you provide?
Inputs: soil_class.asc and soil_classdefinition
3.
The lines from the mhm_parameter.nml and the FinalParameter.nml files.
I have differentiate &soilmoisture1, &soilmoisture2, &soilmoisture3 in mhm_parameter.nml, but in the FinalParameter.nml there is only 1 resulted: &soilmoisture1.
In mhm_outputs.nml I set .TRUE. for outputFlState(3) and outputState(4).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#124 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXSZW3FZP4EZWTBWVDSFSI33FK6X3AVCNFSM6AAAAAB3VRUNCOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43URDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHMYTGNJXGUZDGMA>.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
________________________________
This message is confidential and is intended for the recipient named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not disclose, use or copy the message or any part of it. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message, then delete it from your system.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
I have 4 layers of soils, as such 4 sets of soil moisture parameters are defined in mhm_parameter.nml:, i.e. &soilmoisture1, ... &soilmoisture4, with all attributes.
But why in the optimised FinalParameter.nml, only 1 layer is outputted?
Thanks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions