Penam-Monteith and mHM #65
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Wanted to make a friendly reminder that my question still exists |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Dear Emre, First, net radiation: Resposne: No. Some adjustements are needed. To get the net radiation, you need to estimate outgoing solar and thermal radiation term as well; and then you need to sum of all incoming and outgoing radiation fluxes at the land surface (ofcourse take care of the sign). Check for e.g., https://open.library.okstate.edu/rainorshine/chapter/11-3-net-radiation/ Second, absolute vapor pressure: Response: You need to take care of specific details (constants, formulations, etc) in this converion process. Check details (e.g., here): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/humidity/vignettes/humidity-measures.html Third, for wind speed data, I believe the wind direction is not needed. Am I correct? Hope this helps, solving your issues. thanks. Best, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear all,
Please correct me if I am following a wrong path. As far as I understood while running mHM, in case I don't have PET data, mHM can calculate PET (Potential Evapotranspiration) for me. Also, it gives 3 options to do so. Let's say I have chosen Penam-Monteith (which is promising), I would like to discuss more on the needed variables.
First, net radiation:
I have surface solar radiation downwards and surface thermal radiation downwards (which I think is the greenhouse effect) -- I believe I have to sum these two together to calculate net radiation on surface. Am I right?
Second, absolute vapor pressure:
How may I supply mHM with this? Would multiplying the surface pressure with surface specific humidity (dimensionless) value help?
Third, for wind speed data, I believe the wind direction is not needed. Am I correct?
Thanks in advance,
Emre
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions