Replies: 2 comments
-
|
I'm not actively working on this project anymore. @jevansaks will have to comment on your proposal. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@AArnott I've been supporting an alternate, wrapper-based, Win32 library for over a decade, Vanara. Its main purpose is to make Win32 feel more like C# without wrapping it so heavily that following the C++ samples is difficult. I've been working recently on generators that take native API calls and automatically generate extension methods. After years of standing independent from this project, I'm exploring how I could do this extension generation instead for CsWin32. I have a few questions as I get started:
<GeneratorInjector>CsWinExtGen.dll</GeneratorInjector>). This could take the raw, typically unsafe, function or structure and morph it into something less C++ and more C#, and place that in the generation output alongside or replacing the native output.uint) that would allow for common processing like throwing an exception on failure.Thank you. I look forward to getting involved.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions