|
| 1 | +print Series = 'Tracking the Adversary with MTP Advanced Hunting', EpisodeNumber = 3, Topic = 'Summarizing, Pivoting, and Visualizing Data', Presenters = 'Michael Melone, Tali Ash', Company = 'Microsoft' |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +// summarize |
| 4 | +// The summarize operator enables you to perform |
| 5 | +// a variety of calculations on data. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +// The output of summarize will be a table with one |
| 8 | +// column for each row value you pivoted on as well |
| 9 | +// as one column for each pivot you performed. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +// In the following example, we will calculate the number of e-mails based on whether |
| 12 | +// Office ATP identified them as being malware. |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +// SQL Equivalent: SELECT MalwareFilterVerdict, Count(*) FROM EmailAttachmentInfo GROUP BY MalwareFilterVerdict |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +EmailAttachmentInfo |
| 17 | +| summarize count() by MalwareFilterVerdict |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +// -------------------------------------------- |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +// Summarize can also be used to create 2 column pivots by simply adding another |
| 22 | +// column name after the "by" clause. For example, we will now count the number |
| 23 | +// of e-mails received by sender and recipient combo |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +// You will also notice in this example that the count_ has been renamed to Emails |
| 26 | +// to make the query easier to understand. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +// SQL Equivalent: SELECT TOP 100 SenderFromAddress, RecipientEmailAddress, Emails = Count(*) FROM EmailEvents GROUP BY SenderFromAddress, RecipientEmailAddress ORDER BY Emails DESC |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +EmailEvents |
| 31 | +| summarize Emails = count() by SenderFromAddress, RecipientEmailAddress |
| 32 | +| top 100 by Emails desc |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +// -------------------------------------------- |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +// min() - obtains the minimim value from the set |
| 37 | +// max() - obtains the maximum value from the set |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +// SQL Equivalent: |
| 40 | +// SELECT |
| 41 | +// Earliest = min(Timestamp) |
| 42 | +// , Latest = max(Timestamp) |
| 43 | +// , Count = count() |
| 44 | +// , AccountName |
| 45 | +// FROM AlertEvidence |
| 46 | +// WHERE AccountName LIKE '%' |
| 47 | +// GROUP BY AccountName |
| 48 | +// ORDER BY Count desc |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +AlertEvidence |
| 51 | +| where isnotempty(AccountName) |
| 52 | +| summarize Earliest = min(Timestamp), Latest = max(Timestamp), Count = count() by AccountName |
| 53 | +| order by Count desc |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +// AlertEvidence |
| 56 | +// Contains information on entities and evidence involved in an alert, such as devices, accounts, and emails |
| 57 | +//-------------------------- |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +// Now let's get a bit more advanced. Using the bin() function you can group events by a period of time. |
| 60 | +// Let's take a look at some logon statistics on a daily basis |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +// Using render we can automatically create a chart. Let's look at account logon activity over time on a |
| 63 | +// daily basis by UPN. |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +IdentityLogonEvents |
| 66 | +| where isnotempty(AccountUpn) |
| 67 | +| summarize NumberOfLogons = count() by AccountUpn, bin(Timestamp, 1d) |
| 68 | +| render timechart |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +// render - creates a chart |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +// We can also use this bin'ed data to determine min, max, and average daily logons |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +IdentityLogonEvents |
| 75 | +| where isnotempty(AccountUpn) |
| 76 | +| summarize NumberOfLogons = count() |
| 77 | + by AccountUpn |
| 78 | + , bin(Timestamp, 1d) |
| 79 | +| summarize TotalLogons = sum(NumberOfLogons) |
| 80 | + , AverageDailyLogons = avg(NumberOfLogons) |
| 81 | + , FewestLogonsInADay = min(NumberOfLogons) |
| 82 | + , MostLogonsInADay = max(NumberOfLogons) |
| 83 | + by AccountUpn |
| 84 | +| top 10 by TotalLogons desc |
| 85 | +| render columnchart |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +-------------------------- |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +// You can also use summarize to get the latest event from each category. |
| 90 | +// For example, let's say you want to get the latest check-in information |
| 91 | +// for each device in your instance |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | +// the arg_max() function will maximize the specified argument in the column |
| 94 | +// set based on the "by" parameter. You can either specify the columns you |
| 95 | +// want back as parameters, or just use * to get the entire row. |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +DeviceInfo |
| 98 | +| where isnotempty(OSPlatform) // checkins can be partial or full - this filters out partials |
| 99 | +| summarize arg_max(Timestamp, *) by DeviceId |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +// Let's say you now wanted to use this summarized list to create a report of devices |
| 102 | +// by operating system - but you didn't want to lose the individual device names. |
| 103 | +// Good news - we can also use summarize to build arrays! |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +DeviceInfo |
| 106 | +| where isnotempty(OSPlatform) // checkins can be partial or full - this filters out partials |
| 107 | +| summarize arg_max(Timestamp, *) by DeviceId |
| 108 | +| summarize Devices = count(), DeviceList = make_set(DeviceName) by OSPlatform |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +// ----------------------------- |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +// Another way to perform aggregations is using make-series. The make-series |
| 113 | +// command is similar to summarize except it is designed to calculate on |
| 114 | +// a periodic basis, providing zeros for empty datasets for consistency. |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +EmailEvents |
| 117 | +| make-series count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step 1d by SenderFromDomain |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +// With this we can identify outlier programmatically. Let's see if we can find |
| 120 | +// any sudden increases or decreases in activity relating to mail from a specific |
| 121 | +// domain using one of our time series analysis capabilities. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +// geek stuff warning |
| 124 | + |
| 125 | +EmailEvents |
| 126 | +| make-series MailCount = count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step 1d by SenderFromDomain |
| 127 | +| extend (flag, score, baseline) = series_decompose_anomalies(MailCount) |
| 128 | +| project-reorder flag, score, baseline |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +// series_decompose_anomalies adds three new columns |
| 131 | +// - flag: is the datapoint normal, an abnormal increase (1), or an abnormal decrease (-1) |
| 132 | +// - score: how anomalous is this data point? |
| 133 | +// - baseline: the forecaseted value the algorithm expected |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +// Let's look for spikes in e-mail traffic from a domain. To do this, we need to expand |
| 136 | +// the flag column. Expanding takes an array and creates one row for each value in it. |
| 137 | +// For SQL people, this is like using CROSS APPLY |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | +EmailEvents |
| 140 | +| make-series MailCount = count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step 1d by SenderFromDomain |
| 141 | +| extend (flag, score, baseline) = series_decompose_anomalies(MailCount) |
| 142 | +| project-reorder flag, score, baseline |
| 143 | +| mv-expand flag |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +// now we can filter to only 1's. Note that our lists of values all look like strings. We need |
| 146 | +// to tell KQL that we want these to be int's for accurate comparison. |
| 147 | + |
| 148 | +EmailEvents |
| 149 | +| make-series MailCount = count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step 1d by SenderFromDomain |
| 150 | +| extend (flag, score, baseline) = series_decompose_anomalies(MailCount) |
| 151 | +| mv-expand flag to typeof(int) // expand flag and tell KQL it needs to be an int |
| 152 | +| where flag == 1 // filter to only rows that have a 1 |
| 153 | +| project-reorder flag, score, baseline |
| 154 | + |
| 155 | +// Next, we'll look for the top 5 most anomalous domain spikes and graph the result |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +let interval = 12h; |
| 158 | +EmailEvents |
| 159 | +| make-series MailCount = count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step interval by SenderFromDomain |
| 160 | +| extend (flag, score, baseline) = series_decompose_anomalies(MailCount) |
| 161 | +| mv-expand flag to typeof(int) |
| 162 | +| where flag == 1 // filter to only incremental anomalies |
| 163 | +| mv-expand score to typeof(double) // expand the score array to a double |
| 164 | +| summarize MaxScore = max(score) by SenderFromDomain // get the max score value from each domain |
| 165 | +| top 5 by MaxScore desc // Get the top 5 highest scoring domains |
| 166 | +| join kind=rightsemi EmailEvents on SenderFromDomain // Filter EmailEvents to only these domains |
| 167 | +| summarize count() by SenderFromDomain, bin(Timestamp, interval) // build a new summarization for the graph |
| 168 | +| render timechart // graph it! |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +// Aha! I know someone out there sees my bug. Technically, one of these datasets can have both a spike and |
| 171 | +// a valley and the valley score could be what we're keying off of. Let's try again using logons, but this time |
| 172 | +// we'll get the specific score associated with the spike instead of just assuming that they're the same. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +let interval = 12h; |
| 175 | +IdentityLogonEvents |
| 176 | +| where isnotempty(AccountUpn) |
| 177 | +| make-series LogonCount = count() on Timestamp from ago(30d) to now() step interval by AccountUpn |
| 178 | +| extend (flag, score, baseline) = series_decompose_anomalies(LogonCount) |
| 179 | +| mv-expand with_itemindex = FlagIndex flag to typeof(int) // Expand, but this time include the index in the array as FlagIndex |
| 180 | +| where flag == 1 // Once again, filter only to spikes |
| 181 | +| extend SpikeScore = todouble(score[FlagIndex]) // This will get the specific score associated with the detected spike |
| 182 | +| summarize MaxScore = max(SpikeScore) by AccountUpn |
| 183 | +| top 5 by MaxScore desc |
| 184 | +| join kind=rightsemi IdentityLogonEvents on AccountUpn |
| 185 | +| summarize count() by AccountUpn, bin(Timestamp, interval) |
| 186 | +| render timechart |
0 commit comments