Upload workload to tenant

[dhrumil83]

Uploading the nupgk gives this error, and there seems to be no messages in the audit logs that can point to what's missing.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/workload-development-kit/manage-workload

Followed these steps to upload FE and BE: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/workload-development-kit/azure-web-app-deployment-tutorial
Then tried to upload the nupkg file, so the workload/app is available across our tenant, but that does not seem to work.

Might have missed something, but hard to tell without info in the logs.

My account is missing the workloads tab as shown in the docs. Not clear how to enable that, and maybe that is causing this to fail?

In dev mode, I do see the workload section, but not workload tab.

[anitamayorov]

Hi @dhrumil83,
Please make sure your package is configured correctly -

1. NuGet package structure - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fabric/workload-development-kit/workload-environment#workload-nuget-package-structure

2. XMLs - must conform to the corresponding XSDs,
   https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Fabric-workload-development-sample/blob/main/Backend/src/Packages/manifest/WorkloadDefinition.xsd
   https://github.com/microsoft/Microsoft-Fabric-workload-development-sample/blob/main/Backend/src/Packages/manifest/ItemDefinition.xsd

3. You can verify package structure using the local development scenario, just note the differences of AADApp configurations (e.g., ResourceId)

Regarding WorkloadHub - it is the expected experience for now since no public Workloads available yet (even if there are activated Workloads in the tenant). We are consulting with our Product team on whether this experience matches the developers' requirement, will update.

[dhrumil83]

Changed IsEndpointResolutionService to false.

Changed ResourceId from api://localdevinstance/637a2d98-ac73-4698-aa2d-24ec7d560f05/Org.WorkloadSample to api://esri-fmv-dev-be.azurewebsites.net/637a2d98-ac73-4698-aa2d-24ec7d560f05/Org.WorkloadSample, but still the same error.
Also changed this under "Expose an API" section from localdevinstance to the BE url.
Requestid: 81e8cb7a-2e10-211c-3c63-b12318c89b3f

Also tried to remove ResourceId from the manifest file, but that did not help either. Different message, but I am assuming ResourceId is needed:
{"error":{"code":"ExtensionsInvalidPackage","pbi.error":{"code":"ExtensionsInvalidPackage","details":[{"code":"Reason","detail":{"type":1,"value":"InvalidParameter"}},{"code":"Target","detail":{"type":1,"value":"WorklodDefinition"}}],"exceptionCulprit":1}}}
Requestid: c84da8f9-c295-073f-bd53-0af8adc3dd7a

[anitamayorov]

Hi @dhrumil83,

Your resourceId should look like this:

https://<ISV's tenant verified domain>/<workload frontend server>/<workload backend server>/<workload id>/<optional string>

That's the first requestId - your resourceId as attached in your message has no https scheme, and no sever info

Regarding the second requestId, resourceId under AADApp configuration in manifest is a mandatory field - you cannot omit it from the package.

[dhrumil83]

Thanks @anitamayorov

Possible to do this for tenant level testing without setting up custom domain(using azurewebsites.net, where I have uploaded FE and BE)?
Else can look into the domain setup.

[anitamayorov]

Hi @dhrumil83,
ResourceId property has only two 'modes': developer mode (with the 'localinstance') used for connecting a developer workload to Fabric, and production mode as described in the comment above.
In order to upload and activate a workload in your tenant, you will need the production mode for ResourceId and rest of configurations in your XML files to be compatible with your Entra ID (AAD) configurations, including custom domains.

[dhrumil83]

Hi @anitamayorov

Got the domain setup, but still getting same error with ResourceId not valid
https://fabricdev.geocloud.com/fe/be/Org.WorkloadSample/preview

{
    "error": {
        "code": "ExtensionsInvalidPackage",
        "pbi.error": {
            "code": "ExtensionsInvalidPackage",
            "details": [
                {
                    "code": "Reason",
                    "detail": {
                        "type": 1,
                        "value": "InvalidParameter"
                    }
                },
                {
                    "code": "Target",
                    "detail": {
                        "type": 1,
                        "value": "ResourceId"
                    }
                }
            ],
            "exceptionCulprit": 1
        }
    }
}

Requestid:
8bab442c-19a7-5983-f19b-0cdb86f37a93

Attached is the nupkg file(zipped) that I am trying to upload.
ManifestPackageRelease.1.0.0.nupkg.zip

[anitamayorov]

Hi @dhrumil83,

It looks like your domain is not part of your tenant's verified domains, you will need to configure it in Azure App Service Domain section.
Can you please verify it is configured correctly and try and upload again?

[dhrumil83]

Thanks. That was it.
Upload was successful 👍

[gregahren]

Hi @dhrumil83, ResourceId property has only two 'modes': developer mode (with the 'localinstance') used for connecting a developer workload to Fabric, and production mode as described in the comment above. In order to upload and activate a workload in your tenant, you will need the production mode for ResourceId and rest of configurations in your XML files to be compatible with your Entra ID (AAD) configurations, including custom domains.

Is it possible to publish an unverified package to a tenant separate from the publishers tenant?

For example we have the publisher tenant be gtm.something.com, and we want to publish it to company.us tenant.
From the documentation this limitation is not clear.