Will "consumption-only" plans will ever be replaced in favor of workload profile 'consumption' plans? #1447
Unanswered
onionhammer
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Looks like aspire components are only supported in workload profile environments, so maybe it's already started? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I worry about fully moving all of our workload profile + consumption environments over to consumption-only Container App Environments because I can foresee the day when I get the dreaded email saying "Move all your environments over to workload profiles before December 31st".
The reason I want to move from workload profiles over to consumption only plan:
Consumption-based workload profiles network stack is incredibly unstable and Microsoft support is unwilling to acknowledge that. We've had about 5 different app environments all flake out constantly over the past few weeks (after more than a year of stability) for any app (it appears) relying on persistent TCP connectivity. Some of these app simply use out-of-the-box docker images like Apache superset, not custom code, but they need to be restarted pretty much daily due to network hiccups.
So is there a commitment to keep consumption-only plans going? Will there be a divergence in functionality / features over time? I.e. will there be new features announced for 'workload profile only' or will consumption only plans be deprecated?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions