Deployment without Vnet & Gateway #777
imranshams
started this conversation in
2. Feature requests
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Yes cost increased but the reason we had to increase a footprint in Azure is because we had to deliver deployment script that's secure by default. Please review Azure Infrastructure Architecture and give as a feedback. We also want to avoid maintaining two versions of scripts in repo. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I understand that we previously had a deployment script for Azure without a vNet and Application Gateway.
It would be great if we could have that setup again as a PoC (Proof of Concept) deployment model, especially for situations where we want to demonstrate capabilities to the customer without incurring excessive costs.
I’m aware that enabling public access raises security and compliance concerns, but for the purposes of a PoC, this should be sufficient.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions