Replies: 2 comments
-
@ranjeshj FYI |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks for your feedback and there are some good ideas here. Unfortunately, this most likely won't be something we'll be able to get to in the near term. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, there is duplicate functionality with MenuFlyout and CommandBarFlyout. They are very similar menus, but they use different item controls.
MenuBarFlyout:
CommandBarFlyout
It doesn't natively support sub items, so you'll need to handle that yourself.
There is also MenuBar, with its own item:
MenuFlyout items are limited to having a vertical orientation, with MenuBarItem being used for a horizontal one, but CommandBar(Flyout) items support both orientations.
A solution would be to have a single button set for all menus:
But what if you wanted a simple button with an icon? It's a pretty common use case, but you have to add one yourself as the content, and I think there should be a simpler way to do it.
AppBarButton is suggested to be used if you need icons, but it's a bit weird to use one next to a regular button, especially outside menus.
Even if it was replaced by a MenuItem, the same issue would continue existing.
And even if there was an IconButton, the issue still exists for SplitButton, ToggleButton, SplitToggleButton and DropDownButton.
A solution for that would be to give all of those an Icon property.
This way, you could simply use regular buttons for all menus:
Menus could have their own button styles that adapt to orientation, allowing for #1473.
This would be a much simpler way to create menus.
The problem is that it kinda complicates the Button code. Maybe if you don't specify an icon, it would use a visual state or style without one, and there wouldn't really be a performance hit.
It would also be useful for #2310. See this comment for example usages.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions