You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
<divclass="textblock"><p>We tested <em>mimalloc</em> against many other top allocators over a wide range of benchmarks, ranging from various real world programs to synthetic benchmarks that see how the allocator behaves under more extreme circumstances.</p>
106
-
<p>In our benchmarks, <em>mimalloc</em> always outperforms all other leading allocators (<em>jemalloc</em>, <em>tcmalloc</em>, <em>Hoard</em>, etc) (Apr 2019), and usually uses less memory (up to 25% more in the worst case). A nice property is that it does <em>consistently</em> well over the wide range of benchmarks.</p>
102
+
<p>In our benchmarks, <em>mimalloc</em> always outperforms all other leading allocators (<em>jemalloc</em>, <em>tcmalloc</em>, <em>Hoard</em>, etc) (Jan 2021), and usually uses less memory (up to 25% more in the worst case). A nice property is that it does <em>consistently</em> well over the wide range of benchmarks.</p>
107
103
<p>See the <ahref="https://github.com/microsoft/mimalloc#Performance">Performance</a> section in the <em>mimalloc</em> repository for benchmark results, or the the technical report for detailed benchmark results. </p>
108
-
</div></div><!-- PageDoc -->
109
-
</div><!-- contents -->
104
+
</div></div><!-- contents -->
105
+
</div><!-- PageDoc -->
110
106
</div><!-- doc-content -->
111
107
<!-- start footer part -->
112
108
<divid="nav-path" class="navpath"><!-- id is needed for treeview function! -->
0 commit comments