You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: PR_62549_PORT_STATUS.md
+12-1Lines changed: 12 additions & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -38,5 +38,16 @@ The testdata contains `.diff` files showing differences between the Go implement
38
38
2. The TypeScript submodule baselines haven't been regenerated yet (shallow clone)
39
39
3. The test framework correctly handles these differences
40
40
41
+
## History
42
+
The change from PR #62549 was actually ported **before** it was merged into TypeScript!
43
+
44
+
-**Oct 5, 2025**: @Andarist opened PR #1828 to port microsoft/TypeScript#48172 which added the `ignoreArrowFunctions` parameter
45
+
-**In PR #1828**: The Go implementation was already passing `true` for `ignoreArrowFunctions` in the arguments check
46
+
-**Oct 5, 2025**: @Andarist opened microsoft/TypeScript#62549 to make TypeScript match the Go behavior
47
+
-**Oct 5, 2025**: PR #62549 was merged into TypeScript
48
+
49
+
As noted in the [PR #1828 review](https://github.com/microsoft/typescript-go/pull/1828#discussion_r2404688959):
50
+
> "this has some seemingly unwanted diffs but I think this is basically desired and I opened a PR to Strada to close this gap: microsoft/TypeScript#62549"
51
+
41
52
## Conclusion
42
-
No action needed. The change has been correctly ported and is functioning as expected.
53
+
No action needed. The change has been correctly ported and is functioning as expected. In fact, the Go port led the way, and TypeScript followed!
0 commit comments