Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
This is tracked in #2120 and there is a PR out for it that we need to test before releasing a version with the fix. We're not sure how long this has been broken but it manifested itself in confusing ways which is why we made the change to log a warning and override the IntelliSense configuration temporarily. The warning is only about IntelliSense configuration and can be safely ignored until we release a fix. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello again!
I've started using variants somewhat recently and it is a great feature! My only issue is that the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is not being set to build_type and instead is being set to the full variant.
For example, this is what I have in my cmake-variants.yaml
build_type:
default: debug
choices:
debug:
short: Debug
build_type: Debug
settings:
_build_type: Debug
release:
short: Release
build_type: Release
settings:
_build_type: Release
cts_product:
default: all
choices:
all:
short: all
settings:
_cts_product: all
build_list:
default: cts
choices:
cts:
short: cts
settings:
_build_list:
- crabel-shared
- core
- cts
- nodes
qra:
short: qra
settings:
_build_list:
- crabel-shared
- qra
As you can see I set built_type as either 'Debug' or 'Release'. But when I build I see the following:
[build] Build finished with exit code 0
[cpptools] The build configurations generated do not contain the active build configuration. Using 'Debug' for CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE instead of 'Release all qra' to ensure that IntelliSense configurations can be found
[cpptools] The build configurations generated do not contain the active build configuration. Using 'Debug' for CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE instead of 'Release all qra' to ensure that IntelliSense configurations can be found
At first I thought this was not that big a deal, but recall that I'm using buildType to control my build directory!
#2208
Anyway, this seems like a bug maybe? Or am I doing something wrong?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions