Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
|
Hi, hard to say without looking at the data, but knowing the sequencing quality issues with ONT, I think that during the full length assembly process many clones got filtered out because of that. The alignment step does not discard sequences based on Phred quality hence you see a high coverage rate. Then, when you assemble clones by the CDR3 sequence, you lose some reads (7.29%) due to quality. But with |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been seeing some discrepancies between the percentage of reads that have full VDJ region coverage and the percentage of clones that demonstrate succesfully assembly of VDJ region contigs.
This is a nanopore data and I utilize generic-ont preset with
--assemble-contigs-by VDJRegion parameter.
In the assmebleContigs Report, I see
I expected higher percentage of clones to have successfully assembly of contigs since high percentage of reads demonstrate alignment till the VDJ region. There seems to be some percentages of clones filtered out after assemble.
This is the assemble report.
I am trying to answer based on this data, what percent of clones would have full reconstructed VDJ regions. any help would be appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions