Skip to content

Conversation

@tmichaeldb
Copy link
Contributor

This is needed for other services with API access to be able to connect to datasources if needed

@entelligence-ai-pr-reviews
Copy link

Review Summary

🏷️ Draft Comments (3)

Skipped posting 3 drafted comments based on your review threshold. Feel free to update them here.

mindsdb_sdk/databases.py (3)

35-35: Database.__init__ default argument params: Dict = None is mutable and should default to None to avoid shared state bugs, but the code does not handle the case where params is None before assignment.

Scores:

  • Production Impact: 2
  • Fix Specificity: 5
  • Urgency Impact: 2
  • Total Score: 9

Reason for filtering: The total score does not exceed the required threshold of 13 for inclusion under the current filtering rules.

Analysis: While the fix is clear and directly applicable, the actual production impact and urgency are low because the bug only manifests if the caller passes None and the code does not handle it, which is not a common or critical failure mode. The total score is below the required threshold.


91-95: _list_databases iterates over all rows to build a dict, but if data is large, this could be optimized by using a dictionary comprehension for better readability and slight performance gain.

Scores:

  • Production Impact: 1
  • Fix Specificity: 5
  • Urgency Impact: 1
  • Total Score: 7

Reason for filtering: The comment suggests a minor performance/readability improvement with no significant production impact or urgency. The total score does not meet the required threshold.

Analysis: The suggested change is a minor optimization for readability and slight performance gain, not addressing a critical bug or production issue. The fix is clear, but the impact and urgency are minimal, resulting in a low total score.


103-104: The list method unnecessarily creates an intermediate variable databases before returning its values; can be simplified for clarity.

Scores:

  • Production Impact: 1
  • Fix Specificity: 5
  • Urgency Impact: 1
  • Total Score: 7

Reason for filtering: The comment addresses a minor code clarity and micro-optimization issue with no significant production impact or urgency. It does not meet the required total score threshold for inclusion.

Analysis: The issue is purely stylistic and does not affect production stability or performance in any meaningful way. The fix is clear, but the urgency and impact are minimal, resulting in a low total score.


@tmichaeldb tmichaeldb requested a review from dusvyat May 30, 2025 17:12
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
mindsdb_sdk
   agents.py2115673%33, 101, 104, 107, 110, 118, 126, 146, 167, 178, 181, 185, 187, 189, 191, 193, 195, 257, 270, 281, 292, 296–311, 323, 332–336, 343–344, 392, 400–401, 454, 503–504, 507, 514, 535–537, 541–545
   databases.py49296%118, 146
   handlers.py39197%77
   jobs.py97793%40, 52, 80, 84, 146–149
   knowledge_bases.py1341589%66–69, 135, 161, 190, 197, 201–203, 207, 229–233, 243
   ml_engines.py42393%94, 126, 128
   models.py2101991%109, 140–141, 222, 231, 233, 303, 339, 348, 372, 397, 491, 499, 518, 534, 542, 567, 571, 584
   projects.py63198%160
   query.py13192%14
   skills.py53394%43, 45, 49
   tables.py1301588%140–142, 145, 165, 192, 203–204, 209, 224, 227, 321, 342–347, 356, 376
   views.py37295%105, 138
mindsdb_sdk/connectors
   rest_api.py2555280%19–29, 35–36, 51, 55, 58–59, 79–81, 102, 105, 112–115, 148–156, 177–178, 213–216, 230–231, 285–290, 294–306
mindsdb_sdk/utils
   agents.py50492%72, 79–81
   mind.py47470%1–128
   openai.py853065%37–40, 83–85, 107, 148–158, 215–216, 234–240, 258–276
   table_schema.py21210%1–54
TOTAL162327983% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
28 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 11.115s ⏱️

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from to review to approved in Tracking PRs May 30, 2025
@tmichaeldb tmichaeldb merged commit db6aab0 into main May 30, 2025
6 checks passed
@tmichaeldb tmichaeldb deleted the database-api branch May 30, 2025 17:39
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from approved to merged in Tracking PRs May 30, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 30, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: merged

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants